Re: [Ietf-62] Fwd: So more fun for IETF 62.

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jim Martin wrote:

> Joel,
> 	Ok, sounds fine by me. We've got some folks going to check on 
> physical jack locations and numbers in each room mid-week this week. If you 
> have any questions regarding the site, yell now :-)

Been there a few times... ;)

We'll be there at around noon on the 5th.

> 	As for the network, we'll probably still keep you on a separate VLAN. 
> Want to give you guys the best chance of everything working, and mixing you 
> with the craziness of the IETF wireless crowd probably doesn't help.

Fair enough.

> 	So, how is the data actually traveling? You guys gonna just ship the 
> 8 streams back to UO unicast and then rebroadcast from there? We should have 
> some decent bandwidth at the meeting if you want to source some of the 
> traffic from there.

That's the plan. I have another backup darwin streaminging server at the 
UO and a shoutcast server in co-lo in seattle but my prefered box to 
reflect them off is at the UO.

> 	- Jim
>
> 	(BTW: jrm@nortelnetworks.com hasn't worked since 2001 :-)

yeah funny, some of my contant info is ancient.

> jim@daedelus.com will work forever)
>
> On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Marcia Beaulieu wrote:
>
>> Message from Joel Jaeggli regarding recording all sessions at the IETF, 
>> audio
>> only.
>> 
>>> Envelope-to: mbeaulie@foretec.com
>>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:44:48 -0800 (PST)
>>> From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
>>> X-X-Sender: joelja@twin.uoregon.edu
>>> To: Marcia Beaulieu <mbeaulie@ietf.org>
>>> cc: jrm@nortelnetworks.com
>>> Subject: So more fun for IETF 62.
>>> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
>>> X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
>>> 
>>> The current version my draft descrbing what we want to do it at:
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jaeggli-ietftv-ng-00.txt
>>> 
>>> The practical upshot is there's no need to schedule multicast rooms 
>>> specifically... But it does mean I want try and record/broadcast from all 
>>> 7 or 8 rooms. The big piece of work is ethernet drops instead of two I 
>>> need 8, there's no real reason for them to be on a seperate netowrk, the 
>>> wireless network is probably sufficient since it's 8 x 64Kb/s of unicast 
>>> traffic rather than ~6mb/s of multicast...
>>> 
>>> joelja
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> Joel Jaeggli                Unix Consulting 
>>> joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 
>>> 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-62 mailing list
>> Ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62
>

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting 	       joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu 
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2

_______________________________________________
Ietf-62 mailing list
Ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62