Re: [Ietf-and-github] GitHub usage for GIT

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 10 April 2019 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AFF12023C for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=mxo7GI24; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=KRDZLg51
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3mnOsXl-9K5c for <ietf-and-github@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA221201D0 for <ietf-and-github@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD04358; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:35:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:35:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=W +pGTPJcN+IhJHD5za42zhd23QM5l+a+5LSQGt4LKuM=; b=mxo7GI24vlURL5F9z 5Us4xbwe8L+X+8F49SI9S6/9Vp3gwJwI62r92w1Ywagn3KeEsRg97wpNWu23jtpF ihGhEsJ2j+iS9wm/VzFuT3kKwfX3peu4zDtURAlykdCUDlc/MKsrA4Dt15/HVWYA Uh7UsjQPY2uK08WmCUP9sNUTt9WMup8DG4cP30MRYAiZpE3Vf1lID9zM6ynmUAue 2W30/1JGzzOFMk94PJ5pXY7RqsevnNuhvX0eo54nuG/PcIZrV1xrgd+OCAkHqbrz nkBmGYmeYaCr3R4A4CsOnR8+hbGMrbPSyKv8pvzPk/M+Zp/zIPzQvXoSZ0NJQKzo 5ueWg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=W+pGTPJcN+IhJHD5za42zhd23QM5l+a+5LSQGt4LK uM=; b=KRDZLg51NJCrMOtny7dSQK3mB6sDQXQppIsphH+k0kGBcXCzKuXAmIKSQ 3HMidISWsyTcvIXCBuGPBHLZpIq4NnDce+MteROrm75L0khA+86Af2ieluynNp7u 4unpzsYl9C11NIK/M4+B8dw/bS7UlE8j841tQHCpP+pF8N6h4hzdDUztDMrM87eV JNpqyBamoyrwlx/KJ/uZhAdQz4spzHzGbkCJxySpic4dH1QnZBbdNIn0DmSp3lLO bNRNqufYlxX/qzbBc5FTqWxeVkUYyZR23Bq6Tx+frN3w/Tq8Jl6OR3Gs7GY+E1E5 TPB3Zmy47eD5uA700D/IQ/6Htm5Gg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:h2StXHKbngaqHiDx60r9E6VBAFU9HpDpxctBZK2n1rZCBDH5_PKs0A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrudeigdejgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudeggedrudefiedrudejhedrvdeknecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:h2StXLWRka4cA5gk8DkevdQmVR2G6wmvUPnP2--z5nXhatuLwBZ85g> <xmx:h2StXBjxmY0HVQ0loyE8xtRFDO_XxmO3WB2a9HyFTD5SF2TPLG2kTQ> <xmx:h2StXO-0DZUUt8wlvB_gpIbfDcgx6J64hmgy-J4D1mIU10HNsSDIlQ> <xmx:iGStXNPPjVlH5EWM0YcjypAElrXORdl69-O4d4LM_PAYeYAkegs6ww>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8364AE4382; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:35:34 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <a7ae9e2d-c3fb-43d0-96fe-051efb7b3c99@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:35:32 +1000
Cc: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A9810B9-390D-40D2-A547-3B5B1178FEA1@mnot.net>
References: <CAO8oSXn-Y-zYj+VkjargeDh_DX=Kpu5pJTUboKBV8s-9Mkjquw@mail.gmail.com> <930173E8-BC5B-4F4D-AC3E-052EC38CDC26@mnot.net> <a7ae9e2d-c3fb-43d0-96fe-051efb7b3c99@www.fastmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-and-github/NUbW3rmeIJ4l12EIxlbm0-w4R0c>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-and-github] GitHub usage for GIT
X-BeenThere: ietf-and-github@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of using GitHub in IETF activities, particularly for Working Groups" <ietf-and-github.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-and-github/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-and-github@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-and-github>, <mailto:ietf-and-github-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:35:40 -0000


> On 10 Apr 2019, at 12:51 pm, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, at 11:24, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Creating issues in GitHub already has a very low bar, so I'm not sure 
>> this is encouraging good behaviour; effectively, this is making the 
>> authors do work for anyone who cares to create an issue, no matter how 
>> trivial. If the volume is low this might suffice, but is this something 
>> we want to promote to other WGs?
> 
> I'm fairly sure that we can rely on authors to filter out spam.  Yes, opening an issue creates work for authors, but in my experience, hitting the close button is pretty quick.  I also know how to block people who really abuse the tracker.

I read the text as saying that an author is expected to send email to the WG for each new issues that's raised.


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/