Re: [Ietf-dkim] Looking for a little help testing DKIM failure reports, thank you.

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8871277CC for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:03:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dCg3GU9hfkzg for <ietf-dkim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8135D126DBF for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v15-v6so11615670ljh.13 for <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:03:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jAdPSZ2SjxDJ536ObGdr3a3S0HYFFqTu6oAEzENC0j8=; b=iDowS8iK1vu7Wserw5fmyXsv48nlnYphivKD9dD/xaOGhOcXwRihyzxaC1SwwafzKZ Ie/xaqt9kIiukrkRlPcoEtd/pbh4MJAtSWsgidVZSGAZoE/0dobC5Krbbz8C3ZiE7Doy 4PoE/ASzT4iF5Ux9IeOejdU81KsW0Y/mwzeqbXHAFha9ZLCxkMVxw+6bP2M4mkqXvWwk q7+hw9zGL8zBFkDwt3p9u36JQqwPwjvJ/qR8LjmGlHepyeC3m6keRAtlHfK03zewrGVB Gi8ZCTu5fCURJzeqQb5LHAm21kLBrg0mKvJZSKF05imxCvsWc3ig3vYW3qEwEbuPIenv GQsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jAdPSZ2SjxDJ536ObGdr3a3S0HYFFqTu6oAEzENC0j8=; b=B50V+BGJNlQQAi3P6RlN6FXKCeqyctjAfbphKimGBTqA9g9mD5X4IKLw4ncnPz0WMW XNILtk+tNk8qVGXvyRfrOMxFdkfYOaB974+aqQmaHNiPPMQfj2J0CD/0i195IxDW1Ip5 Fe7BL9opf0z0BBYmPrk7KvouL5g4Zi+5iBrT2LlvjcZQCVul8vblbBR9nQTZQYY+XQzd 6VJyZnXaKJPZPIcvBi6Qmv7SF79sfJD3SwPQWJQtUUUR9rO1qZJ9z/yr6n6gOsKqXDVM IecDLdBo9NWFxKHt2iONplUmftsGJFBLkVXWz46aqvom839QSrYBiaj51uGFxBs3cvpj v3MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZZvJWwLLJlcqNxhFksBW3hM1sUMgAF4w5WMl7T2eAvBPGVngvz JCLuSlClyjullK3zBzqbV+0h8PHjB+PLtQPjrTJxNZt3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XYDzU80dm2Rca2saCkZEcRYWiQ5RcxIwWC0RczGvyFcN4OVOfwvIsoolDF2G7c5Iuh+pRdkxNP9wHEKb0gMrY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:750a:: with SMTP id q10-v6mr8838965ljc.39.1545066187374; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:03:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR05MB5859247C857BBA67D10324D598BC0@BN7PR05MB5859.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB5859247C857BBA67D10324D598BC0@BN7PR05MB5859.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:02:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZk8ig5-YHnMuuVfvk0T22_SO31baCCAC0bA1Jy7mmOgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fazzina, Angelo" <angelo.fazzina@uconn.edu>
Cc: "ietf-dkim@ietf.org" <ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040cf91057d3ac1af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/CkeR3hluS5MiF5v3QRmtwxLdh1U>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Looking for a little help testing DKIM failure reports, thank you.
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM List <ietf-dkim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-dkim/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:03:13 -0000

DKIM verifiers are not required to generate reports.  It's completely
optional.  Does the place you're sending to advertise somehow that they
will be generated?

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:36 AM Fazzina, Angelo <angelo.fazzina@uconn.edu>;
wrote:

> Hi, I am trying to test my TXT records for the ability to report failures.
> Talking about RFC 6651
>
>
>
> *These are my records*
>
>
>
> dkim1._domainkey.mta5.uits.uconn.edu    text = "v=DKIM1\; k=rsa\;
> p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC/YIuJIABa9M7Ox5AXs6CP6z26d/i9JDrHW58YU/OzfsEr6yADboIOydCaiiVaNuwtkbx
>
>
> catzd6/iutxWbAiY51rRAvVdBs2YIoGO6Glzeev66ft8IfMnHgxND438KIsdOjUmJZuglFJUWGzCYDSC1eq/zqDVncFwTxWkKW/qtxQIDAQAB"
>
>
>
> _report._domainkey.mta5.uits.uconn.edu  text = "ra=dkim-errors\; rp=100\;
> rr=all"
>
>
>
>
>
> *Here is a test email sig header*
>
> v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mta5.uits.uconn.edu; s=dkim1;
> t=1544820643; r=y; bh=9ZoLOUiYT9ubu7ykLiU305ZLqHeoTNV83po4QgGRepU=;
> h=To:From:Subject:Date:From;
> b=uPOMfVq7Ilr0/e2GEwEIiRotuX1gacod2Tmk7c1lfcYUpNTUznjUXPyNidTlbhrLA
> ylDHc1xE1P/B1NBo0awxBN4Qbwjz8UWUC1vQpQsrenWnhr+Rp46g7KKqWWZ2Sjw0O0
> 0RV2EF9aD1UP5bd7qLtuQHQ9gye5cVCBv6uVdM7g=
>
>
>
> *Here is a test email result header*
>
> spf=none (sender IP is 137.99.25.249) smtp.mailfrom=appmail.uconn.edu;
> uconn.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dkim=fail (invalid public key) header.d=
> mta5.uits.uconn.edu;uconn.mail.onmicrosoft.com; dmarc=none action=none
> header.from=appmail.uconn.edu;compauth=pass reason=105
>
>
>
>
>
> So I can simulate a failure, but cannot seem to get a report emailed to
> dkim-errors@mta5.uits.uconn.edu ?
>
>
>
> *I made sure account exists on server:*
>
> [root@mta5 home]# ls -l /home/|grep dkim
>
> drwx------. 2 dkim-errors       dkim-errors         78 Dec 10 16:21
> dkim-errors
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How often are the failure reports generated ? did not see that mentioned
> in the RFC’s ?
>
>
>
> Does anyone see anything obvious that I am doing wrong ?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> -ANGELO FAZZINA
>
>
>
> *ITS Service Manager:*
>
> Spam and Virus Prevention
>
> Mass Mailing
>
> G Suite/Gmail
>
>
>
> angelo@uconn.edu
>
> University of Connecticut,  ITS, SSG, Server Systems
>
> 860-486-9075
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-dkim mailing list
> Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
>