Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ?
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 11 February 2010 21:03 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C310E3A720C for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:03:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TW7BgwXfOHMf for <ietf-outcomes@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:03:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFAE3A6F19 for <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:03:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-201.cisco.com [64.101.72.201]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECCFF40126 for <ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:04:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B7470D0.4080702@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:04:16 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
References: <4B74702B.90501@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B74702B.90501@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms090902090206040803010802"
Subject: Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ?
X-BeenThere: ietf-outcomes@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Outcomes Wiki discussion list <ietf-outcomes.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-outcomes>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-outcomes@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-outcomes>, <mailto:ietf-outcomes-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:03:03 -0000
On 2/11/10 2:01 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > In formulating the original list of Adoption values, I had assumed that > prompting "extensive derivative work" was an additional /degree/ of > success, not a different /kind/. So it did not occur to me that > something could have "some adoption" and also prompt derivative work. I was quite tempted to do +> for XMPP (there are hundreds of extensions beyond the core use cases), but I figured I'd let someone else try it first. However, given that Facebook just enabled XMPP support (add 400m users to existing guesstimates), perhaps ++ is in order. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ? Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ? Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [ietf-outcomes] "+>" ? Dave CROCKER