Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 07:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44420123FFD; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:10:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.91.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154943705913.32195.5767358135257812709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:10:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RtTXM-yZ44G6-It3m95sL3Bo3Zw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:11:00 -0000
Reviewer: Erik Kline Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-?? Reviewer: Erik Kline Review Date: 2019-02-05 IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Seems generally ready to go, but I have a few questions. I apologize if these don't many any sense in the proper context of this document. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: [1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication? [2] WRT to the final lines of 5.1: [a] "Replace all references to RFC 5988 in that registry have been replaced..." doesn't scan well, I think. [b] If the IANA repo in question is https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml, I don't see any mention of 5988 in there. [3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never allocate "example" in the .well-known space?
- Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc57… Erik Kline
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-r… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-r… Julian Reschke
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-r… Barry Leiba
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-r… Erik Kline