IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07

Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net> Sat, 20 April 2019 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ravis@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A141203C1; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3G4_h1-5QxM; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3940712034F; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3K278Qa026857; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:11 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=TDZepmPBPvMyZMVXESf1PyfjUjt2B8LCQY4WpOIuJEM=; b=nixUOR1KoGilfQCXH7AB207BycWS7tXqB7i2STS9S+/CFrrq9QVMamkahczBEuyLJuEW 1lLUG9rQxwX1CwNNrvFvFZFVe2ZzsQGNFTENQwOVZNqOCdPFaltwGFAvQnbaU3MQNyYU 2sky7vflMm1VjYvlMZD56luSFqdVGkUqaJ+/r0SqSNAQ0uKNz6EIvtZf+pM/l+s444S+ qud/Qi64MrcudLTIr455yKmvi3gqvh/I334i7U9CL0KC/9pDyUXhXT0RswsMOlQH67ex 7+PR07MAfWClvZaLRacJ2Wndp9wG4MIpGZKUppzRSEJzFXD+bj+vvrSfXbmu6h76EL4A Wg==
Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.52]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ryjuv0gdx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:09:11 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.202.158) by BYAPR05MB5141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.231.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1835.7; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:05 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655d:a12d:1434:d92]) by BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::655d:a12d:1434:d92%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1835.007; Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:05 +0000
From: Ravi Singh <ravis@juniper.net>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags.all@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
Thread-Index: AQHU5/7YZJ3JPAnZuUmTsomkfgUsnqZC1MHA
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:04 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR05MB44089444B4F70C43A1FA7064AB200@BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <155406348044.12345.16546699941704674212@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155406348044.12345.16546699941704674212@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.239.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 687d5ce0-134a-4207-9abe-08d6c5352a22
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB5141;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB5141:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB5141A34AB00FEDCA97067C47AB200@BYAPR05MB5141.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0013079544
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(366004)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(86362001)(33656002)(73956011)(53546011)(14454004)(53936002)(6246003)(7696005)(9686003)(305945005)(99286004)(76176011)(102836004)(478600001)(5660300002)(446003)(66446008)(66946007)(76116006)(486006)(64756008)(11346002)(2501003)(66476007)(256004)(14444005)(6506007)(26005)(4744005)(186003)(74316002)(52536014)(55016002)(71190400001)(81156014)(54906003)(316002)(66066001)(8676002)(68736007)(476003)(7736002)(2906002)(6116002)(8936002)(81166006)(3846002)(25786009)(229853002)(97736004)(66556008)(6436002)(71200400001)(110136005)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB5141; H:BYAPR05MB4408.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EQmKGVFboI4E1Pm1GJQN0sZmML9S9aNSORDurKYGSWk3MSCcf49B3h7i81rKwkNbi5dstVMP9retDTZX0+PKuqhW2UviR5yspNFu2cGqx/3cp1CIe71mKpOfGXJFG4iPe8449fzEhBWa7AgDtPhRuj+FK8HP7c/gV0GU7gT7Zo38U+Hob6ZCepdwTKmE/YlBpQxOkbTW6SaFHwF1/mcNw/fxa0brMp9YJubb8IHkMw9cYmv+iaDHWBO/8lAZBav0jy9OGew0gBB08B9WRF8ugcyoyz/DMaCcDR6KW10jbSHVHjJd5eaBHB8SV4lrEn7/TTg4BCPhN8MiidkZpet+yX1MbzpSjSMAkknJAcBs0y8AvXbl6XI0+JYBiYanFrevfoVAdNibH8/G9AIa2peRiIHEPrxEuKvIH+C4k+4FOyA=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 687d5ce0-134a-4207-9abe-08d6c5352a22
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Apr 2019 02:09:04.8744 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB5141
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-20_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904200014
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dkfIIO_MKjK4OPlr7s9Zd5VUZ8w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 02:09:14 -0000

Thanks Jouni.
Taken care of this feedback in latest version.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 1:18 PM
> To: ops-dir@ietf.org
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags.all@ietf.org;
> bess@ietf.org
> Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-vpls-control-flags-07
> 
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I read the document and think it is ready. IDNits warnings and comments are
> easily/automatically fixed when new version is submitted.
> 
> I only have few editorial nits/suggestions.
> * Section 5.1 says "Assuming the below specified network topology.." while it
> could also use an exact reference to Figure 1. * Section 5 is written so that it
> assumed the reader has already read Section 6. Maybe swapping Sections 5
> and
> 6 order would make sense?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email