Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99
Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Sat, 27 May 2017 14:06 UTC
Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FB912944E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2017 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZHqZhH9Gk5n for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2017 07:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic312-29.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (sonic312-29.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [77.238.178.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B172A1200C5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 May 2017 07:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1495893972; bh=Ke/X1Mv2deYFg23h/YgGuMhRkpPyqmCUrgUoAbBEhro=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=NP81lK0KcYbzwa8p1kp3cT9iw166r6GRR3esuCwUpWZdX5Hzx7J3nvMu3N2BIZ0k6Jp0h6uXqRKi+9JUHC2G43YMOeFnBeBe6pwMOcH4iIXalRRQf/NBt0SZNqOpGuzzJw43GbXn76QoKTHnOcfNLOvnQf/VrhJ+TD0z0iaJvtAxH1hmOOyXU1Tg0kFJZYJikM3yPwP6yhYEOx9f3sacJ1j0E/tdu1UWwo2Ub34CQ57WpOtUrDxV13SsshP04xG4bJI/svD4sl9u65xOdM6znU/42y9OjefqBo66EfVyKl5rebkyMnP0SrdAoKJXHZzvXGs7d4m8SzNN9fW6ge4iBg==
X-YMail-OSG: hU38w6UVM1ljITDWJg5B_3B3wbRb1hviAkDByHC2jRoYKGbrgXFbERojbjVmQRj OdxunPOQ03cigIUjZvK56enjGEcdeEqSb091DPim.V8uDpTjM9qTfoaGY3uADPA5RWDkj.V4vThJ oKNGncAMqmnw3AHtZiB8wQC3OC7uCtB5NOYzsAaYlIGooO44rAGdX57c.bdCHQ0gjYKBKYiw1hAD ygOIcvrHrBmt6niQLXFfXwKFuWiJdmr_7N8sDagW2BtSSISSfLHs0mU9q_nJWSP8gM2JtDypIjOE MXKBwQ0ouBz3oMG3KdT_Vkqk_04RmSgcVgOV4kVKgiXL.OJKE5JiGiwejlJkb9zFSyYABqadLxhP zNGgBtbQ3NFzP_Wo6PltdTR7cj5AqxliwzisnT1JLN7F5kHwydxkGzDGv1AQDtg1afxkhscfW33r wKaGmEStbf2HLVpyBNTDeL39d.55oE9Gu7Os8QQMCgsqd0zRpwzu9PtwPGHhPIH7Hu1Eyx.kdX7T 0c.juCSibzq2.rLindj4hSK1iruhCuRy0nVc1SriVPoLLostBKG3P
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 27 May 2017 14:06:12 +0000
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 14:06:11 +0000
From: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply-To: Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1847083762.1690966.1495893971671@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <F93ADBDA-0304-4545-8319-6600898D379E@gmail.com>
References: <F93ADBDA-0304-4545-8319-6600898D379E@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.9726 YahooMailNeo Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/58.0.3029.110 Safari/537.36
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Zh0MyGmC2IFpL9kIy7pB-p1_pLg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 14:06:16 -0000
It's interesting watching the ongoing ossification of the IETF and its workflow process. RFCs were originally actual requests for comments. (What was the first internet-draft requesting comments?) Workgroups begat BOFs to possibly lead to workgroups. BOFs became formalised to beget Bar BOFs once the BOF process was formalised. I was half-expecting bar seating reservations and waitlists, with applications for bar discussions to be accepted by a new ad-hoc committee, leading to Bar Queue Grouping Formaulation discussions for Bar BOF applications... And now we have side meetings? Bar, humbug. Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood ________________________________ From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org> Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, 27 May 2017, 6:25 Subject: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Hi all, The IESG has discussed how to improve the path for potential new topics to be discussed transparently in the IETF community. For some cross-area topics, it is quite useful to have active conversation among a group of people to work on defining the potential work and how it interacts with existing efforts. As the IETF week is quite busy, it can be a challenge to arrange these side-meetings to avoid conflicts. To facilitate the scheduling of these conversational side-meetings, the IESG has decided to provide a meeting room at IETF 99 in Prague for around 30 people, with a U-shaped table, that will be available for first-come first-served (FCFS) signup online as soon as the final IETF meeting agenda is published. This experiment will be conducted for IETF 99 in Prague and will replace AD approval for rooms for side-meetings for potential new topics. Proponents of potential new topics are reminded that the BoF deadline is June 2; this includes non-WG forming BoFs. The on-site signup FCFS room (seats about 16) will continue to be available at IETF 99. Thanks Suresh (on behalf of the IESG)
- Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Melinda Shore
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Yoav Nir
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Alia Atlas
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 John C Klensin
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Lloyd Wood
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Spencer Dawkins at IETF