IETF Logo Mail Archive

Updating BCP 10 -- round two

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 09:07 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440701A873A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gUzOQaEPauW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339E81A871B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n3so3141471wiv.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=U8Y3uwjZAMNmGNfVEYINIDmDiV+qsJiKJJarsZMh25c=; b=EUtR81j4jpQhDyKHuTBjmSlDj5Zli68P30SLp3Yn5Z9gEy+1PFCSOY4ZZRDbUN5OSj sfpFOkMomHfeMua0r35ot1c/VS+oYALC+2549Me8YIBLnAHhvGQVA5H5ZX8fcvO4gnU4 ax8Juyfn+hZNxp4zt3vTZWeasFUUICJDVKiX0QtgMzWuw/eEdhT+C55CSkREllIyA3NX 0Yp55O7MNbBr8A7oFPYP8yLg30zZrzwLvfFRIO76yIP+vlXji0vSc+/nIOzwwiAEvk6U iPwj6vcmB2aOMl0k1sA5ujcJhGcMW+sTMarjVUVA46Gs7q+TToS5DxMLp4IFaQo4Capk E7gQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.39.72 with SMTP id n8mr53363023wik.59.1423645649929; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.179.146 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:07:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbGG2=VgmUWEE6W3D+0qennThqnCP85X0Q85i94meu68g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Updating BCP 10 -- round two
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135e5d0400bb6050ecc55da"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hJlBLITEZOXmqWvJomYXFlPctOI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:07:38 -0000

I've posted -02 of this draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc7437bis/

I think it incorporates all of the suggestions I've received except for:

(a) Allison's suggestion for guidance about using "slow thinking" in its
deliberations (waiting for text); and

(b) Michael's suggestion to re-work eligibility (needs more discussion or
an actual text proposal).

Please look at the diff to confirm I captured your ideas and didn't break
the document in the process.  I'll spin up -03 after another round of
feedback and/or the above items appear.

Thanks!

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email