Side meetings experiment at IETF 99
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 20:24 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DA3129449; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UeLhbFVtV0iP; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610941287A5; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l74so9442739ywe.2; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=yDhQpxaXNDjoejCEU/XULfWQbpjB9UPTOYNivIti/cg=; b=PYpE9MP/uOxLfIfzPUokABPGSgfwFnEc1bPmk30GgWbSKq/LXMLHvSW9QIQk4WWac3 6RmyMDtKP32CJNbUQc8AzKZPgfTCJMIPrkSQeUreMHQzxM0hWJMWmiLmx4BQ3fztnX3h 3JalOHOEUXeyhe7sacnxivH7ErrXvuU6DhL0Oi9EKmsXSEH3mjoU4x9JrGA51hdvTV9q jQBY3L+0xuiy6wHqT/UHFxPak6xZtlFMKf1XgmpsQb7/qTk0wqNhw1rPQRvYLsp0ZikX f1uwWa/WgIqu6XiLvx1o13685Bwkn77vri1gSHVjtuQ0lIi6qCdOGDBog9cuXKCtD9t5 nkeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=yDhQpxaXNDjoejCEU/XULfWQbpjB9UPTOYNivIti/cg=; b=EikytL2XnU3WhOIBpnkYRF3X4uLaxVSgYyFXQRdlARSouE0BPkFCFQgP8oQ5Wz2MIK f4SYd/eNggtoJXWdmADh4wsReMmaPBgF63AcHed69CRp5MbJDhjASDUXXfvXEJwvzGhH ly1v/5ZifcDjtkcdyrZeEnVwafGt+M+AHpV5SUdGtREOkyoREEtNtNT7JoCjAClS5vYV Zm7hE1yDx0TyVCV3T0YIRR/SqJ4a8sQq1fwRxse/Nw4aUOTyx3wdOeBMsO5Uehytt/Io 252Pc/HZFb/ubNjKLzXE28vGAo3XB/QcgL09bqBFKW9C3A2RuujpMFnKdxUCVTv5h8tL jm+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcB3MyYckFsJWkusUEL8lpJua26/vIMRyjwvaahwLZlaTUL4US9S I5A0yV3hskrT4ysngW4=
X-Received: by 10.129.82.195 with SMTP id g186mr3381533ywb.89.1495830271315; Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k128sm1608400ywb.58.2017.05.26.13.24.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 May 2017 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99
Message-Id: <F93ADBDA-0304-4545-8319-6600898D379E@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 16:24:32 -0400
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pf3iqgJIHsC0f984mBC1VE4-mBs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 20:24:34 -0000
Hi all, The IESG has discussed how to improve the path for potential new topics to be discussed transparently in the IETF community. For some cross-area topics, it is quite useful to have active conversation among a group of people to work on defining the potential work and how it interacts with existing efforts. As the IETF week is quite busy, it can be a challenge to arrange these side-meetings to avoid conflicts. To facilitate the scheduling of these conversational side-meetings, the IESG has decided to provide a meeting room at IETF 99 in Prague for around 30 people, with a U-shaped table, that will be available for first-come first-served (FCFS) signup online as soon as the final IETF meeting agenda is published. This experiment will be conducted for IETF 99 in Prague and will replace AD approval for rooms for side-meetings for potential new topics. Proponents of potential new topics are reminded that the BoF deadline is June 2; this includes non-WG forming BoFs. The on-site signup FCFS room (seats about 16) will continue to be available at IETF 99. Thanks Suresh (on behalf of the IESG)
- Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Melinda Shore
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Yoav Nir
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Alia Atlas
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 John C Klensin
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Lloyd Wood
- Re: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99 Spencer Dawkins at IETF