Re: Recall process
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sat, 23 March 2019 16:40 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CCE1279E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2asl-qSwrv4p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2AE1277DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 09:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1h7jhS-000IvK-Mt; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:40:50 -0400
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 12:40:45 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Recall process
Message-ID: <BA14D0F42766BAEA178BE0AD@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dFiXAjeuAfXKnrpDqN+fKZkYHrAj1Hps_HG_vWM0=25g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190320133947.0cbb5a40@elandnews.com> <2F213E70-5614-494D-AE10-1FEE8C368861@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190320191719.0c3d9ea8@elandnews.com> <068a5f67-47cf-2362-9045-7e1949034316@alvestrand.no> <CA+9kkMALG=nP9z3XzJyT1Q-x+n8MoPE2aNg2C413joHXYf+Cdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-dFiXAjeuAfXKnrpDqN+fKZkYHrAj1Hps_HG_vWM0=25g@mail.gmail.c om>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rrsV1ukXrdkzTA8EnRzRKiVLWAw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:40:54 -0000
Spencer, Ted, --On Friday, March 22, 2019 03:51 -0500 Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm top posting - how much of this discussion could we > short-circuit and conclude by picking a number, and I don't > know what number is right, for recall signature eligibility, of > > - people who are Nomcom-eligible, or > - would be Nomcom-eligible if we counted registered remote > participants the same way we count on-site participants? >... > If people have enough skin in the game to have registered for > three out of the past five IETF meetings, as wither onsite or > remote participants, that's at least a higher bar than me > passing out a recall petition for middle school students to > sign, the next time I spend the day talking to several hundred > middle school students. > > And if that's not the right proxy for "people who care about > the IETF, but don't travel to IETF meetings", what is? Depending on what we think the problem is that we are trying to solve, one could figure out how to titrate the formula a bit, e.g., by requiring remote participants to actually log into a WG session or two rather than just registering, but yes. See below. On the other hand, if one is going to go into the sock puppet business, the incremental difficulty of setting up twenty socket puppets over setting up, say, five, is likely to be small indeed. The benefit also wouldn't come in terms of getting someone out of a position because, AFAIK, no one has proposed changing the rules for members of an actual recall committee, much less the nomcom. Perhaps those need attention to but the key issue at this point is just being able to initiate a recall. > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:07 AM Ted Hardie > <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >... >> I disagree that it is low. As written, the bar excludes all >> of the people who are currently serving in any >> nomcom-appointed role (all of the IESG, IAB, IETF LLC, >> Trustees) and requires that the signatories be diverse in >> origin: >> >> All individual and collective qualifications of >> nominating committee eligibility are applicable, >> including that no more than two signatories may have >> the same primary affiliation. >> >> These are both trade-offs to avoid factional control, but >> they make the effective bar much higher than it would be if >> it were just 20 people out of the active IETF population. >> Persuading others to put their names out as making the >> request has not been shown to work well, even in cases where >> the issues were well known. I think the latter has become more important over time. It may be just me, but, even for the much lighter-weight (and usually less personally threatening to specific people in the leadership) appeals procedure, I'm hearing a lot more "not worth it given the risk of retaliation" comments than I heard a decade or so ago. AFAIK, that is more a change in the participant population than an increase in obnoxious behavior by the leadership but the effect is the same either way -- raising the bar to effective use of either appeals or the recall procedure. >> I don't necessarily disagree with where the bar is; I've gone >> back and forth on that over time and may do so again. But I >> think the evidence is that it is pretty difficult to exercise >> and I agree that it is even more difficult for active >> contributors who could not themselves sign. Agreed. No reason why either of you should remember, but I posted a draft to address a subset of these issues somewhat over thirteen years ago. It didn't go anywhere and I never got around posting a revision that reflected a few of the comments I got at the time. Mostly because I don't have the time or energy to pursue this much further but partially because I'm not confident I have the right answers (like Ted, I've gone back and forth about at least parts of it), I've handed the source for that draft and a few hints over to Subramanian Moonesamy. I trust he will pursue the issue via an I-D, which will at least help focus the discussion. He may list me as co-author because of the original draft, but I'm leaving all of the fine-tuning decisions to him and, after the draft is posted, to the community. best, john
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Michael Richardson
- Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: Recall process Scott O. Bradner
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: Recall process Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Recall process Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- RE: Recall process Adrian Farrel
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: Recall process Harald Alvestrand
- RE: Recall process John C Klensin
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: Recall process Ólafur Gudmundsson
- Re: Recall process Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Recall process Theodore V Faber
- Re: Recall process Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- RE: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: Recall process Ted Hardie
- Re: Recall process Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Recall process John C Klensin
- voting rights in general Dave Taht
- Re: voting rights in general Brian Carpenter
- Re: voting rights in general Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: voting rights in general Ted Lemon
- Re: voting rights in general John C Klensin
- Re: voting rights in general Michael Richardson
- Re: voting rights in general Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: voting rights in general Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: voting rights in general Ted Lemon
- Re: voting rights in general Harald Alvestrand
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general Eric Burger
- Re: voting rights in general Melinda Shore
- Re: voting rights in general Dave Taht
- Re: voting rights in general Eric Burger
- Re: voting rights in general Donald Eastlake
- Re: voting rights in general Theodore Ts'o
- Re: voting rights in general Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: voting rights in general Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Recall process Adrian Farrel
- Re: voting rights in general Dave Cridland
- RE: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: voting rights in general Michael StJohns
- Re: voting rights in general Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: voting rights in general ned+ietf
- Re: voting rights in general Nico Williams
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general Nico Williams
- Re: voting rights in general Melinda Shore
- Re: voting rights in general Ted Lemon
- Re: voting rights in general Nico Williams
- Re: voting rights in general Nico Williams
- Re: voting rights in general S Moonesamy
- Re: voting rights in general John Levine
- Re: voting rights in general Ted Lemon
- RE: Recall process John C Klensin
- Re: voting rights in general Nico Williams
- Re: voting rights in general John R Levine
- RE: Recall process S Moonesamy
- RE: Recall process John C Klensin
- Re: voting rights in general Charlie Perkins
- Re: voting rights in general Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general Stan Kalisch
- Re: voting rights in general Stan Kalisch
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general Stan Kalisch
- RE: Recall process S Moonesamy
- Re: voting rights in general Brian E Carpenter
- Re: voting rights in general Salz, Rich
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general Stan Kalisch
- Re: Recall process joel jaeggli
- RE: Recall process Adrian Farrel
- Re: Recall process S Moonesamy
- RE: voting rights in general Eric Gray
- Re: voting rights in general Wes Hardaker
- Re: voting rights in general Dave Taht
- cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was Re: … Michael Richardson
- Re: voting rights in general Keith Moore
- Re: voting rights in general ned+ietf
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Nico Williams
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Salz, Rich
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Nico Williams
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Salz, Rich
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Brian Haberman
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Tim Chown
- RE: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Adrian Farrel
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Yoav Nir
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Melinda Shore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Keith Moore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Keith Moore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Melinda Shore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Keith Moore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Melinda Shore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Michael Richardson
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Keith Moore
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Stan Kalisch
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Eric Heflin
- Recall process (was: voting rights in general) S Moonesamy
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … avri@acm.org
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Mary B
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Tim Chown
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Michael Richardson
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … tom petch
- Re: cultural sensitivity towards new comers (was … Spencer Dawkins at IETF