Follow-up on the issue of IETF members being unable to attend.
Dave Burstein <daveb@dslprime.com> Wed, 01 February 2017 07:54 UTC
Return-Path: <daveburstein2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB51C129434 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:54:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dss--PZ3XJbr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 161BC1293FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k127so253661824vke.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:54:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iSEqko4jW5PyDrmeUiXzR1UhORhRGESYBa9D7PDPCfs=; b=tA8cp3mz8gstlTqN/Bl9VJYV7HgqXI1wQfUcFlaai1p/7xFUMRM8oHZs80k622TrGQ hjxjR3qL9zqBp3h/vGUod6ZxT4oLt1XVGVOCxlDP1q/d1BLTYpqsj8xIev4Zho3Xlxaq JPdmnFYvje88VOvvdbLjA3d2H+4RNYWABS7guvPlERYikU0g1n7FdTBZ9gaPMpLVN4EX N803s/4FpfDQRbZxiXPrMCEX80v+luKq0CAacM34mklxCGsV55ECtKRaqZU67No9bhz/ ZISmrVCveau52FwixTV48iwnvLQ39txqpxiImPsoVh0bFSaN5HvSd9hvEeGq5r28Je+H 0e0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=iSEqko4jW5PyDrmeUiXzR1UhORhRGESYBa9D7PDPCfs=; b=KqM01MBUKlywwryY/1VXHL8XiUUOvREWWYMN6JWefLjhRkYgq+P+NjNXbl5KnRLSCy FD4uhc5c0Ck9MglxU1UdfHB5CD5FjOKcBZG8k2uwjReiNoX9gbDboRuU9aOt8WFNeAhf uSYGR3j8dvniNOMqWlmSlzLVW5M6+b370Aq3kwg4Gyv97htm+Skc3l55iqblQPtd2/8k Fr2w/ez4nr6IVQQxybbUcrW4ThTQvqKohRVQKHyNr2ohAR8Kfroo2aM4tpQ2J+A/CMnS ObfwHAVKXrU0RU1/QWzisvl7ExNThtctNlhxqSjjQEU9z4rkmJ7RR35ohZasyAfnULDM wyUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIqxGF3QmIrNYywzsIfMtV8SejdOxd0kcjoR67Qt2lqL+H2gOuBgfb1dqS5OFRmWgOBCaiwMBU+tvFvUQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.6.72 with SMTP id 69mr509336vkg.19.1485935667766; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:54:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: daveburstein2@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.68.145 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:53:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Burstein <daveb@dslprime.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:53:57 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: gOE08ZgkER9naTwsh-HcY7HeEYw
Message-ID: <CAAUuzMTcqHLyZL5jokhMh8JOCvVHneD1pFjYoyn4EVk7LFwD6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Follow-up on the issue of IETF members being unable to attend.
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143dc6ca2ee250547735b84"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tmLC2WUg3NL5bXYGRm_Qyf_20nI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:54:31 -0000
Folks I want to thank Jari, Leslie, and Andrew for speaking rapidly and clearly. I believe they are wise to address the issues directly affecting IETF rather than discussing the merits of U.S. policy. I believe just about everyone following this knows the issues and nothing would be gained by political discussion. A few follow-up suggestions, carefully chosen to be procedural. I'm mostly a lurker here.: - That the IETF liaisons courteously forward our blog to the organizations we connect with. I just got a note in IEEE that they are considering a policy and believe what we've decided could help their discussion. I particularly would like to hear from Gonzalo with any response we get from 3GPP, a European-based group that might have a different perspective. - That we take up the offer of support from ISOC that Kathy Brown posted on the ISOC list. They have a communications staff of about a dozen full-time people. I've heard from two ISOC Board members as well as Kathy that they are deeply committed to doing what's right here. They might help if we reach out and reiterate that IETF is open to all. That could be as simple as a letter to the editor of leading publications in the countries most directly involved. I assume that whoever signs the note will carefully not present personal opinions as IETF policy. We could also send out the blog we have. - That we consider providing refunds to those blocked from attending. I'm told that IEEE will almost definitely offer refunds. I'd suspect the total would not be that large. It will be discussed at a teleconference February 7 http://www.ieee802.org/minutes/Conference-calls/Conference-calls.shtml . I believe there are many IEEE members here and the call is open to all. I have been reporting on this at http://bit.ly/2kKIjY3, which I'm posting as a bit.ly link rather than with a title some might think subjective. Dave Burstein -- Editor, Fast Net News, 5GW News, Net Policy News and DSL Prime Author with Jennie Bourne DSL (Wiley) and Web Video: Making It Great, Getting It Noticed (Peachpit)
- Follow-up on the issue of IETF members being unab… Dave Burstein
- Re: Follow-up on the issue of IETF members being … Pat Thaler
- Re: Follow-up on the issue of IETF members being … Bless, Roland (TM)