Re: [saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to Informational RFC

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

I didn't see the post on the main list, but my view is that this doc 
needs to be handled in SAAG. I do not support its moving forward as an 
individual draft.

Joe

On 7/8/2014 8:34 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> IETF LC started as promised.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt>
> (Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time) to
> Informational RFC
> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:09:40 -0700
> From: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Reply-To: [e-mail]
> To: IETF-Announce <[e-mail]>
>
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
> - 'Opportunistic Security: some protection most of the time'
>    <draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security-01.txt> as Informational RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2014-08-05. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This memo defines the term "opportunistic security".  In contrast to
>     the established approach of delivering strong protection some of the
>     time, opportunistic security strives to deliver at least some
>     protection most of the time.  The primary goal is therefore broad
>     interoperability, with security policy tailored to the capabilities
>     of peer systems.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dukhovni-opportunistic-security/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
> This document and a predecessor have been the subject of discussion
> on the saag mailing list. [1]
>
>      [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/maillist.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
>