[EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531
Eli Skeggs <skeggse@gmail.com> Sun, 25 June 2017 04:11 UTC
Return-Path: <skeggse@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E5C128D69 for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u-9eIVc6eESS for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80036126CE8 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d78so25809331qkb.1 for <ima@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:delivered-to:mime-version; bh=w2Zm6WFYTGsC0b4SCfkWSKaVNHT+2KLxK6IGHA66/vs=; b=OShXONXWpO+4csauTWbktqKhQB1TSnehfKvrT+f1qq4nXnjHJFdX7CwCz/lhqWvRHa +/dzrpdPyYBU4gKkKU34t17YFHKGLViDAGgWAg1gE862mJBgwoZnWKYuyGZZPH+ly68O 4pT1vhLg3FnFhPd7AjCDR+28TYBkkg9id8P88ZhfhAfLb5q6fMyb1BBgtpuF3kiqg9lN 1npySJ7wjd5mmtTC8VdCUUEMr8GugpNmzydWDChARxHSS8aj9Z278Jld+YyngvyjUbpL JZdcu4u914FadcKtSBb4o3r5Qneq9DFp/VfAxFTQQUIYxuw1aCH4sU9UvKXlIWcY4SZn r/Cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:delivered-to :mime-version; bh=w2Zm6WFYTGsC0b4SCfkWSKaVNHT+2KLxK6IGHA66/vs=; b=XzNRmWRA7/ZXgTUhsICnTTD7OushZV+irGwBO+OTFG61Ye3Azcln1O9w0suX5nyLQi 6rqbHJ1aqq57VtMS+UyxnRTQXNCvO1vLyIY4DVG9ltlOlFEy+JIU6ZdcMWE54XQnc8Xq FsTLlkK59P2KoTZNBFsJQNQoAIEeCoPa5HpchSwy9Z7mrdeG0iCmAmv50Yxxjzr1U9C4 IF1Wk5iawxThx0lnfbS2LIGtVohuIBR+frXz1qd5Yfe+RQZ+fCVhzygmnGTs3991oiVq uaUZGqIVCjxRXeEmge/n3DpIazRxF2F0KkU2sytXRItW4U7QlfFKBBu62PG9YftBTvWB PZMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOz9IrWILsi6ZFBWTIsNdZ0hlRIR1f7VLISJT67LkERosF8pvfK0 JKsFXnJj7/wbh162CFE=
X-Received: by 10.55.214.221 with SMTP id p90mr16792243qkl.228.1498363897476; Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (send-23.prod.mixmax-mailer.com. [52.206.110.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i29sm6852138qkh.4.2017.06.24.21.11.37 for <ima@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----sinikael-?=_1-14983638970620.28659488900927643"
From: Eli Skeggs <skeggse@gmail.com>
To: ima@ietf.org
Message-Id: <dd1a0dc5-b1c2-d0c8-fa2f-852f71c49424@mixmax.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 04:11:34 +0000
X-Mixmax-Message-Id: NLBkZboRzbcNPhNFc
Delivered-To: rsm@mixmax.com
X-Mailer: Mixmax (mixmax.com)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ima/grW4rwlbNqHkEvgCbcG3-PsCrco>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:23:34 -0700
Subject: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ima/>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 04:14:12 -0000
Minor correction to the copy available at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3: Page 7 includes a link to "RFC 5890, Section 2.3.2.1." The 2.3.2.1 portion incorrectly links to the nonexistent section 2.3.2.1 of RFC 6531 (to itself), where the prior portion of the link is correct. The link immediately precedes the <U-label> import definition. Thanks,Eli
- [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 Eli Skeggs
- Re: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 Jiankang Yao
- Re: [EAI] Question regarding RFC 6531 Alexey Melnikov