Re: [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages
Brandon Long <blong@google.com> Fri, 23 June 2017 21:11 UTC
Return-Path: <blong@google.com>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5111294F8 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QOax0VrTBdsZ for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C361294DC for <imap5@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id y47so39498087oty.0 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TnzQNGd/9PxdiHvMVm1Psk0Y3ceOxLTFNhYJlTzMRvQ=; b=sZ2QF0Pvg6BfVe9y3BKzOnz5ulBveuTH6Cw7BKjJQBoJvZTJyLveT/x6b1LcubVWkt RFw4zjhEjGQrO6SLM0xompuyFXfiXliRUfgmKQncA4miqfyNL19CucgIs4IGoo5fxjcZ AcRJTIh+yUchpQnp5qs6MxBfa9xqgENi+jvcTdYP5oGQ6DbFUXufCtUwwRDzX/0Yyxv1 OpNulDcAoIyM6Q1rBHQ3WTqhGWBI0IzenF4pG+Mx1hxjaMABClpeBM8r8EU6LFIxQ61t wbWiEN3FbcVPBN0eIKgok2omUyePsv4+8xnpWuCxnsUet/c2wplHpUXz+HPHR9kgokLc ZR0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TnzQNGd/9PxdiHvMVm1Psk0Y3ceOxLTFNhYJlTzMRvQ=; b=CB2RTxqrnAxpc47Wuv49HfEKteWe6GV0BU/CdYSq1rDfKvV9DSv9nMuv0qMYPPjpNM 4nVTuRWEZ+6vEWiT6sZrKVs60X8r8u+8Efp3ZJVIToTN7aMs4JJpMF0ciP+Xp0oW/ZCS liaMuRvz1O6nJ6s8c5Q4rz4lTWvjKUxrcSpIz1td2vXwBN8t3ZvhrjK8cv2iakqXVdnx 4D5CqTN1GCgHNu/K5j3VNTjYbqvLHMEf83/6PU16okRWewY5UoK/FrTjtNpWbspPE2ml ZVU3gmeZe+pAoto7/lfkZ6yDsjSyPTFvPNa2Rr/dac8/WP5S7uWUP8wIblWveO8nSfD/ 51Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzBsT6wshFx9qO+RZUkKdME5I6v7sowE70otJTE1UWleBThjMr/ AQeKC/o2/kVJmiunzRz/W45yWGbC7Sd1
X-Received: by 10.157.47.193 with SMTP id b1mr4798957otd.78.1498252272034; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.68.42 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANPRqbAnT5TyZLJiB_NsQkgNFqqdONAo4jbrJmV_A8zK0fwjyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANPRqbAnT5TyZLJiB_NsQkgNFqqdONAo4jbrJmV_A8zK0fwjyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CABa8R6thCACHxcpjfRgwAmV9PoznJVx4ZOrUCrLjCObw8We2wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdallah B <bahassinea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dcc0675ed1e0552a70ae0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/imap5/uKyX4FEkVfARamUrUtD2dgjvnBo>
Subject: Re: [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/imap5/>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:11:15 -0000
Do you mean like the $Junk/$NotJunk/$Phishing keywords in the iana registry? https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-keywords/imap-keywords.xhtml#imap-keywords-1 Brandon On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Abdallah B <bahassinea@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In the most common email clients there is the ability to filter undesired > messages. Filtering is good but i think the client should inform the mail > server that all the messages from the server are now marked as undesirable > in the client side. This way, the server will be able to mark this client > as blacklisted and be able to not send more messages. > > Sorry poor english. > > _______________________________________________ > imap5 mailing list > imap5@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5 > >
- [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages Abdallah B
- Re: [imap5] Ability to manage rejected messages Brandon Long