[Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 08:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8E5126557 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9fcA6Pex3bK for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4423B129562 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 01:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) by opfednr24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id D899B401BC; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.3]) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id A84131A00C8; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:11:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM5D.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::9898:741c:bc1d:258d%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:11:20 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "Bob Briscoe (ietf@bobbriscoe.net)" <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
CC: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC
Thread-Index: AdMBL8MQU3YBpnYmSjaXmXmS66QYOA==
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:11:19 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A00F869@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300A00F869OPEXCLILMA3corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/cYHz-g_xGCfk9yuv_WfpU4nHuWQ>
Subject: [Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:11:24 -0000
Bob, You asked during your presentation whether SFC is to be marked as N/A. I confirm. SFC encapsulation is not a transport encapsulation. ECN should be managed by the transport encapsulation used within an SFC-enabled domain. You have a long list of encap protocols; it is actually cool to reduce that list by one :) Cheers, Med
- [Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-area] Open issue: rfc6040update & SFC Bob Briscoe