IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] FW: Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 09 October 2017 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306CF129A89 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0HGPvt22V45 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 23:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901DB1326FE for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Oct 2017 23:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 25978B0; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1507530020; bh=jYUx49enQAXuq0prWglSra4goEI/2u2lov1prAhgEl0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZIp35Db5uUrtFVe1ibfPxdEWKFmTgdheBIsLILNVGhk4lkFQKvw8oOtOHheL0EyDB FIQc5KsdYUbmKjHwSis99heCPiAyRLHa0THSHoCYhn+90/B1r9SjKidlF6GlYeSMkZ GVJGIS7D1iTAv0wOJ/b/Y0NQTyud9tUiMDsZsqZM=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C5084; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 08:20:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 08:20:19 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
cc: int-area@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <447F3821-BB5B-4792-8D47-1BAB3C907289@strayalpha.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710090810550.31961@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <DB6PR08MB2679ED40D8A942AC3963E4A189700@DB6PR08MB2679.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <97838bfd-10c3-9c24-8313-16167f4f554d@hs-augsburg.de> <AM4PR0401MB22411AE46796D3B9C9E0F140BD760@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <68F1C4B3-9365-4684-9D88-98D1042B3C55@strayalpha.com> <AM4PR0401MB2241A54D5C46D765680BD71FBD760@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <447F3821-BB5B-4792-8D47-1BAB3C907289@strayalpha.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="-137064504-263351251-1507530019=:31961"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/oylkGKWCS1vMmblG5KYnNMmclbc>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] FW: Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 06:20:26 -0000

Hi,

So while I have previously pointed out to Khaled that he's not supposed to 
forward private email to the list (which he has repeatedly done), in this 
specific incident it seems to me that you did actually cc int-area here? 
It can be seen in the "CC" below, and I did receive the email you sent 
that Khaled repled to.

Nontheless, I would like to say that people interested in IPmix should go 
somewhere outside the IETF and work on their ideas. There has already been 
press indicating that "the IETF is working on the successor to IPv6" which 
is just further causing problem with FUD regarding IPv6 deployment.

On Sat, 7 Oct 2017, Joe Touch wrote:

> To others on the list: yes, this is another example of unauthorized forwarding of private mail. 
>
> However, in this case I’m glad. 
>
> In encourage others who have posted about this topic to make their position clear as well. 
>
> Joe
>
>> On Oct 7, 2017, at 2:56 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Khaled Omar 
>> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:56 PM
>> To: 'Joe Touch'
>> Subject: RE: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)
>> 
>>> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate?
>> 
>> You can check all e-mails sent to the int-area WG discussing IPmix (IPv10).
>> 
>>> I will not be participating further.
>> 
>> This is up to you.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Khaled Omar
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch@strayalpha.com] 
>> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2017 11:45 PM
>> To: Khaled Omar
>> Cc: Rolf Winter; int-area
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for support: IPmix I-D (was IPv10)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> people started to participate 
>> 
>> Can you provide the list of who you think will participate?
>> 
>> To make my position clear, I cared only about making sure the name does no further damage to the IP version codepoint. I will not be participating further. 
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status