[Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10

Tatuya Jinmei via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 30 January 2023 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1453EC14CE45; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 22:46:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tatuya Jinmei via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mls-architecture.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, mls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.6.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167506120307.61575.12546953893984927280@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Tatuya Jinmei <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 22:46:43 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/URffVLH9-b2bpMqU06EoydK6PUo>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 06:46:43 -0000

Reviewer: Tatuya Jinmei
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for
draft-ietf-mls-architecture-10.txt. These comments were written primarily for
the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s)
should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other
IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that
have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

I've reviewed the draft in terms of issues or concerns for the Internet Area.
I've not seen any such issues. And, overall, the document is well written and
looks complete for publication.

The only possible nit I might note is that some technical terms such as
"Proposal" or "Commit" messages are used without a reference or definition,
which confused me while reviewing the draft. From a quick look at the protocol
draft, these may be defined in that draft, but in any case, it would be more
reader friendly if the architecture draft has a "terminology" section, listing
some of those terms with a brief description and or a proper reference.