RE: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 28 February 2006 21:12 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC95-0003jy-1g; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:35 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC91-0003iz-IB for ipcdn@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:31 -0500
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.222.163]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC90-0005M2-7m for ipcdn@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:31 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1SLCRDL028588; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:12:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <DVB4XVA8>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:26 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15509721720@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: Jean-Francois Mule <jf.mule@cablelabs.com>, "Ipcdn (E-mail)" <ipcdn@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: RE: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ipcdn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP over Cable Data Network <ipcdn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>, <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipcdn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>, <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipcdn-bounces@ietf.org
So may I ask the authors to keep this in mind for AUTH48? That is if there is not other reason to recycle, which we will only know by Thursday. Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Francois Mule [mailto:jf.mule@cablelabs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 21:37 > To: Ipcdn (E-mail); Russ Housley > Subject: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2 > > > fyi - this is valid for all references to ITU-T. > Thanks Russ. > Jean-Francois > > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:02 AM > To: iesg@ietf.org > Cc: Richard Woundy @ Comcast; RWoundy@broadband.att.com; Jean-Francois > Mule; Randy_Presuhn@mindspring.com; david.raftus@terayon.com; Eduardo > Cardona > Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2 > > Comment: > > Section 2.9: s/ITU-T J112/ITU-T Recommendation J.112/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPCDN mailing list > IPCDN@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn > _______________________________________________ IPCDN mailing list IPCDN@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn
- [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2 Jean-Francois Mule
- RE: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rf… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)