RE: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Tue, 28 February 2006 21:12 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC95-0003jy-1g; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:35 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC91-0003iz-IB for ipcdn@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:31 -0500
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com ([192.11.222.163]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FEC90-0005M2-7m for ipcdn@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:31 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1SLCRDL028588; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:12:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <DVB4XVA8>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:26 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15509721720@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: Jean-Francois Mule <jf.mule@cablelabs.com>, "Ipcdn (E-mail)" <ipcdn@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: RE: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ipcdn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP over Cable Data Network <ipcdn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>, <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipcdn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn>, <mailto:ipcdn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipcdn-bounces@ietf.org

So may I ask the authors to keep this in mind for AUTH48?
That is if there is not other reason to recycle, which we
will only know by Thursday.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Francois Mule [mailto:jf.mule@cablelabs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 21:37
> To: Ipcdn (E-mail); Russ Housley
> Subject: [ipcdn] FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2 
> 
> 
> fyi - this is valid for all references to ITU-T. 
> Thanks Russ.
> Jean-Francois
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:02 AM
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: Richard Woundy @ Comcast; RWoundy@broadband.att.com; Jean-Francois
> Mule; Randy_Presuhn@mindspring.com; david.raftus@terayon.com; Eduardo
> Cardona
> Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-ipcdn-docs-rfmibv2 
> 
> Comment:
> 
>   Section 2.9: s/ITU-T J112/ITU-T Recommendation J.112/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPCDN mailing list
> IPCDN@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn
> 

_______________________________________________
IPCDN mailing list
IPCDN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipcdn