Re: [IPFIX] [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll fordraft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE8A129DA3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cx1Hhc1ELGgw; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916B2129D26; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by puck.nether.net (Postfix, from userid 162) id 3A35454080D; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:08:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:08:23 -0500
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: =?utf-8?B?5p2O5oyv5by6?= <13911635816@139.com>
Message-ID: <20170216170823.GA30571@puck.nether.net>
References: <5c1874b1-e7cd-4d6f-869f-b4d2f334f94d@Tims-iPhone>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <5c1874b1-e7cd-4d6f-869f-b4d2f334f94d@Tims-iPhone>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/pY9zawG6QlFN1aHfYuu8fB8Pm8w>
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>, grow <grow@ietf.org>, "lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com" <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>, opsawg-chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, PJ Aitken <pjaitken@brocade.com>, grow-bounces <grow-bounces@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll fordraft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:08:46 -0000

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:53:23PM +0800, 李振强 wrote:
> Thank you P.J. Aitken.
> 
> The length of IPFIX message is sufficient for BGP standard communities, since the length of standard community is 4 octets. But the sizes of extended community, large community and wide community are bigger than the size of standard community. If the working group agrees to cover the above all kinds of communities in this draft, do you think we should open the discussion for IPFIX
> 

	I believe there should be coverage for 1997 as well as the upcoming large communities.

	- Jared