IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] Updated PWG Message Catalog Help Extensions (HELPME) draft posted for review

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Wed, 03 July 2019 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3409C1200DB for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pJQRY-1Ki_rC for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A769B120096 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 0C722617E; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:24:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801A92708; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:24:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 7B01D3F46; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054D03C85 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from retina15x.lan (67-204-236-184.eastlink.ca [67.204.236.184]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E69D80859; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 21:24:45 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
In-Reply-To: <3FE2E12C-A950-4E36-87EE-D0E193464921@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:24:44 -0400
Message-Id: <F55E023D-3AEC-42A0-8498-0D0A1B1E7B8D@msweet.org>
References: <AB795E2D-A4DF-4B48-BB59-59002E8FAE5A@hp.com> <AC643050-8727-4B33-8E12-43EAA284EFB3@hp.com> <0C182B04-96D2-4B6D-8C95-78C8594488CB@msweet.org> <3FE2E12C-A950-4E36-87EE-D0E193464921@hp.com>
To: Smith Kennedy <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Updated PWG Message Catalog Help Extensions (HELPME) draft posted for review
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Smith,

If we go the errata path, then posting an initial JPS3 draft is my preference.


> On Jul 3, 2019, at 5:16 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> I like that idea, Mike! As you probably noticed, I posted an update to the “help me“ white paper a few minutes ago. I can also post a 5100.13 errata draft update to review as an alternative. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Smith
> ---
> Smith Kennedy
> smith.kennedy@hp.com
> 
> 
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org> wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, if we are talking about including this in a spec, then let's just do an errata update of JPS3 with these extensions included. Then we can update the other JPS3 issues and have all of our core documents for IPP Everywhere up-to-date...
>> 
>> 
>> > On Jul 3, 2019, at 2:41 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Greetings,
>> > 
>> > In the review from June 27, we discussed the plusses and minuses of moving this from a "Best Practice" document to a specification. That would affect the tone and intent of the Design Requirements and the normative language. The consensus was that PWG Message Catalog Help Extensions (HELPME) ought to be a specification rather than a Best Practice document.
>> > 
>> > Any feedback for or against changing PWG Message Catalog Help Extensions (HELPME) to a specification?
>> > 
>> > Smith
>> > 
>> > /**
>> > Smith Kennedy
>> > HP Inc.
>> > */
>> > 
>> >> On May 28, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Signed PGP part
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> 
>> >> I've posted a new draft of PWG Message Catalog Help Extensions (HELPME) to the PWG FTP site here:
>> >> 
>> >> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipphelpme-20190528.docx 
>> >> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipphelpme-20190528.pdf 
>> >> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipphelpme-20190528-rev.docx
>> >> https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ipphelpme-20190528-rev.pdf 
>> >> 
>> >> I wasn't sure what to say about using "//" as the start of an absolute URL, but other than that all feedback from the April 25 review was addressed.
>> >> 
>> >> Cheers!
>> >> 
>> >> Smith
>> >> 
>> >> /**
>> >> Smith Kennedy
>> >> HP Inc.
>> >> */
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ipp mailing list
>> > ipp@pwg.org
>> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>> 
>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email