IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] FYI: Report on prototyping for original IPP Production Printing Attributes - Set 1

"Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & Standards Architect\) via ipp" <ipp@pwg.org> Tue, 25 June 2019 23:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712AD120123 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=hp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id By5BArp6Hy1J for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60D81200C5 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id D7AB02687; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B58CE9; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 97AC02621; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com [63.128.21.162]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53031CB1 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:16 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hp.com; s=mimecast20180716; t=1561506855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u0VmsJrqv8XSp9oelziRWPNMGWHyu2Y9S93QaPnnIXk=; b=i30d02lgJu80lzs0ydsMM9bq6JfBAKzJz1bP+qm67TZTmHXPJRwDtI9DKbvQYDwKuUskUn xXfw5C772grJKJ6BZUfLVQhMGNwf5nA8dWjUp4C/zNj+UU+KEXBwnyoyd1n4lFNMmnKlDM LlhVsgnYo6hN4iEZSbBvuvYgMFvJTsM=
Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam04lp2050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.46.50]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-164-SV9kNdDPMOKYz0Ng-o7xpQ-1; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 19:54:13 -0400
X-MC-Unique: SV9kNdDPMOKYz0Ng-o7xpQ-1
Received: from CS1PR8401MB1270.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.169.98.7) by CS1PR8401MB0823.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.169.96.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2008.16; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:12 +0000
Received: from CS1PR8401MB1270.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::9cd7:9666:c0a5:3bf2]) by CS1PR8401MB1270.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::9cd7:9666:c0a5:3bf2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2008.017; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:12 +0000
To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPP] FYI: Report on prototyping for original IPP Production Printing Attributes - Set 1
Thread-Index: AQHVKscA4DKoB1hKoUmvgJIr2kp5saatDQIA
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:54:12 +0000
Message-ID: <428006A3-F724-4B52-93E3-BC7EE0A1548E@hp.com>
References: <B72B110D-66AA-4F8E-A709-E7624785A388@msweet.org>
In-Reply-To: <B72B110D-66AA-4F8E-A709-E7624785A388@msweet.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=smith.kennedy@hp.com;
x-originating-ip: [107.77.228.131]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 43de3885-4c20-491a-bbe6-08d6f9c86c5b
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(49563074)(7193020); SRVR:CS1PR8401MB0823;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CS1PR8401MB0823:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CS1PR8401MB082322AA4C7839D1D12969629EE30@CS1PR8401MB0823.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3968;
x-forefront-prvs: 0079056367
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(346002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(6602003)(186003)(54896002)(6306002)(99936001)(6916009)(2906002)(606006)(6512007)(81166006)(8936002)(81156014)(14444005)(256004)(14454004)(7736002)(6486002)(486006)(66616009)(66556008)(66476007)(966005)(76116006)(91956017)(66446008)(2616005)(99286004)(476003)(236005)(6246003)(64756008)(229853002)(8676002)(6436002)(33656002)(53936002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(446003)(66946007)(73956011)(478600001)(11346002)(68736007)(25786009)(36756003)(53546011)(6506007)(86362001)(66066001)(102836004)(76176011)(5660300002)(4326008)(316002)(3846002)(6116002)(26005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CS1PR8401MB0823; H:CS1PR8401MB1270.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: hp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: hiR9cKCxj7K43ZLGHwaInF8x20P39HBVH6FcFOi7tUBYKncjC2wNMJx/Hkh51+GpS8o566iU5XcKL8uAYedV+aHzX5K1aBwR6asOTO4sOKeJZW9VzkWsbWz0Q7jtyqwz+JvGsbEO9bLE21wsfvsxrkHW6Pw15pP716JR6Gwb9+9CKXls1LdHWiEUOCh7bDyIbs0rjl6hfst253JYGiK751oNc8KLaDf1wz3aPV4r+h7/jeZfs2uJTBwj6N+52Pf9g9V/UTUYkZuunTICkuKrfxSYfbs6A571rHhYFBFo9uCg0ahjVa/y/oaguajTiHLXlaraGinV7ZiOqFNkAj9Vyy1eeF7A/VueTAP/tL1lECzsom43hQxc2vqUj/oJUTrMfl80ElkfhYwvnT5LWfKpJ/xiMbcB1N0tq7KSqeqLAeQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hp.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 43de3885-4c20-491a-bbe6-08d6f9c86c5b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Jun 2019 23:54:12.5830 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ca7981a2-785a-463d-b82a-3db87dfc3ce6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: smith.kennedy@hp.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CS1PR8401MB0823
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] FYI: Report on prototyping for original IPP Production Printing Attributes - Set 1
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp" <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7166694722396430941=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Thanks for looking into this Mike! I agree with your assessment below.

Smith



> On Jun 24, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I did some digging into what level of prototyping was done for the original IPP Production Printing Attributes - Set 1 specification (PWG 5100.3-2001).  As near as I can tell from the mailing list archives and meeting minutes, *no* prototyping was reported.  In fact, the process document that was in effect at the time (I think) was:
> 
>     https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/process/Historical/pwg-process.pdf <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/xzXhC31v5vipGD2EDcqKUtZ?domain=ftp.pwg.org>
> 
> The original published 5100.3 used the "PWG Draft Standard" status (corresponding to the old IETF Draft Standard status), which means that it should have had some level of prototyping, however the process document said nothing about prototyping beyond the following:
> 
> It is expected that the PWG Draft Standard takes into account implementation experience gained from prototype activities done during the development of the document.
> 
> So unless we can dig up any significant amount of prototyping that was done for 5100.3-2001, I recommend we wait for an actual prototype report for the v2.0 document.
> 
> Note: As I mentioned during today's conference call, I believe we can prototype all of the required attributes in the current draft in ippserver without too much difficulty.  The attributes can be reported/supported already, but are currently not implemented by ipptransform, e.g., to use cardstock media for covers and/or add blank insert sheets and separator sheets in the right places...
> 
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/xzILC2kr5rfpR5895cnidC7?domain=pwg.org


_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email