Re: [ippm] Paris meeting

[Al Morton <[e-mail]>]

Hi Henk,

As Rüdiger says, we've added a new analysis section
in -testplan-rfc2679-01 <<< note higher version than agenda.
Rüdiger has investigated the experimental conditions
needed for successful delay distribution comparison using
the Anderson-Darling K-sample tests.

Also, -testplan-rfc2680-02 <<< note higher version than agenda
now includes the results and analysis where there were only
placeholders before, including goodness-of-fit for our
Poisson stream implementations. This draft has never been
presented at an IPPM meeting.

Unfortunately, both these drafts were published last Sunday the 11th,
so the working group hasn't had much time to find them among the
tide of other submissions near the deadline.

The first draft on the agenda, has been discussed both on-list
and face-to-face since the last ippm session, but it too
has never been presented at an IPPM meeting. Version 02
addresses the latest comments, as you said.

So, this is an opportunity for ippm folks to read the drafts
and help us earn some agenda time.

regards,
Al



At 06:24 AM 3/14/2012, [e-mail] wrote:
>Hi Henk,
>
>Al and I have added some more test results in testplan-rfc2679. We'd be
>happy to present them.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ruediger
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] 
>[mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Henk Uijterwaal
>Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:17 AM
>To: IETF IPPM WG
>Subject: [ippm] Paris meeting
>
>IPPM Group,
>
>We have a 2 hour slot at the Paris meeting.  I'm currently trying to decide
>if we need this slot for a face-2-face meeting.  Agenda requests so-far,
>besides the usual administrative stuff.
>
>1. draft-morton-ippm-rate-problem-01.txt
>    new version addressing Yaakov's comments in -02
>
>2. draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00
>    minor updates
>
>3. draft-morton-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01
>    new version.
>
>    I have not seen any discussion on these 3 
> drafts on the list.  The question
>    is whether a face-2-face discussion is needed to discuss issues on the
>    drafts.
>
>4. draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-valua-added-octets
>    I have received 2 comments on this draft by private mail.  I'll summarize
>    to the list once the comment period is over.  I'm keeping some time
>    for this on the agenda though I doubt that a face-2-face discussion will
>    be necessary.
>
>So, with this in mind, if you are the author of any of the drafts, please
>let me know what you want to discuss in Paris.
>
>Of course, if you have other agenda topics but didn't ask for a slot, please
>do so today.
>
>Henk
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
>                                           http://www.uijterwaal.nl
>                                           Phone: [phone]
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
>                                  (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)
>_______________________________________________
>ippm mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>_______________________________________________
>ippm mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm