[ippm] IPPM WG status

Bill Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A981A0159 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:38:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRMh5xOP7RBh for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29381A0155 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4320A2B for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 21:38:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:38:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=6EcnHe0E7zqehzsD04lQJ6pOC0U=; b=giz wYqU1/ruoDbkXT457uEyoP417cWhBAkluU0/fjFeYAz0Xc2rBHSoxzA3idba50pP lsLdJs8ztN5fXVXB4CJPpRbnAWeRKOKFLJTpGpaYrsqVFFmHuG6dyB8ojnsye+qE 0AuPzfYaKnOwoUYyrLTP+0uQlRVcJMg0sV/qBsZ8=
X-Sasl-enc: By5aKC2pdKmCN63OeInLKVx/lPshE12r/GMvvgX+UfvX 1391395131
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (unknown [24.231.177.41]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3C370680226 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 21:38:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Bill Cerveny <ippm@wjcerveny.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68DFF3A0-7735-4D2D-B2B3-1FC1AD7B4D61@wjcerveny.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:38:52 -0500
To: ippm@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Subject: [ippm] IPPM WG status
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 02:38:58 -0000

Greetings IPPMers,

As we begin approaching the next IETF meeting in London March 2-7, below is a summary of IPPM WG status. As suggested by our area director, we're hoping to provide updates on a regular basis (every month or two?). If the authors have anything specific they'd like to have included in the status, please let Brian Trammell or I know.

Best Regards,
Bill Cerveny

Working Group Document Status:

draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04, "Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track". 
- This document has been submitted to the IESG for publication and is currently undergoing AD evaluation.

draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-01, "Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM". 
- Last updated October 16, 2013. 
- At IETF 88 in Vancouver, 9 IPPM WG attendees indicated they would review the document. However, unless the reviews have been addressed directly to the authors, there hasn't been any review activity. The authors are interested in more reviews!

draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec-01, "Network Performance Measurement for IPsec". 
- Last updated October 21, 2013. -
- An updated draft is expected shortly.

draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-01,	"A Reference Path and Measurement Points for LMAP". 
- Last updated September 24, 2013

draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-01,	"Model Based Bulk Performance Metrics"  
- Last updated October 21, 2013.

draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-05, "Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement". 
- Last updated December 12, 2013.

Performance Metric Registry Design Team Status: The team intends to submit a unified proposal by the -00 deadline, to be considered for adoption as a working group item.