IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ippm] Proposed Change of Intended Status: draft-ietf-checksum-trailer

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Tue, 06 October 2015 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122561B40B0 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GQrp4LrIxRUn for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226A1ACE4C for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-255-15.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CC21233B6; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.255.124]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9CDE06F1; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:00:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90%25]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 11:02:00 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (ietf@trammell.ch)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, "Bill Cerveny (ietf@wjcerveny.com)" <ietf@wjcerveny.com>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 11:02:00 -0400
Thread-Topic: Proposed Change of Intended Status: draft-ietf-checksum-trailer
Thread-Index: AdEAR2eg3dzZ6mgBSiuy1eaxHJ1XZA==
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0BB4843086@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/rHZSjVgNre5ewJ4PcDWNdLq3e4k>
Subject: [ippm] Proposed Change of Intended Status: draft-ietf-checksum-trailer
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:02:07 -0000

IPPM,

In my role as Doc Shepherd for 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-checksum-trailer-02
here's the status as I know it.

We had notification of IPR on this draft to IPPM list in August:
no one replied, and I mentioned this in an
revision of the Shepherd's form (in September).

Subsequently, the NTP working Group reviewed a similar 
checksum feature for NTP whose document status was Experimental.
It has been proposed that theses related drafts proceed
to IESG with the *same* Intended Status. 

**ACTION**
This message opens another comment period to
ask the WG if there is any concern with a change of 
draft-ietf-checksum-trailer status to Experimental
from Informational.  Brian Haberman clarified that we do not
need to re-do Last Call if we make this change, 
as Experimental and Informational are considered the
same level.

Please send any comments regarding this Intended Status change 
to the ippm-list, by October 13, 2015.

thanks and regards,
Al

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email