[ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 09 July 2012 04:46 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD1621F8569; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ygEFsMsQT6Y; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4FB21F85D0; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.30p2
Message-ID: <20120709044603.12917.62842.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:46:03 -0700
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:46:31 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
Author(s) : Len Ciavattone
Ruediger Geib
Al Morton
Matthias Wieser
Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-00.txt
Pages : 26
Date : 2012-07-08
Abstract:
This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the
standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics.
Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the
primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo
describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement
clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and
implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations
have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680.
In this version, the results are presented in the R-tool output form.
Beautification is future work.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-00
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc26… internet-drafts