Re: Expired patents

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Fri, 20 June 2014 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D57D1B27B1 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0vayrUpPAnT for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D741A0393 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5KDXZ6r027933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:33:39 -0700
Message-ID: <53A437EB.8040702@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:32:27 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPR WG <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Expired patents
References: <53A38D52.1070604@gmail.com> <53A39C22.5070702@dcrocker.net> <CFC921F5.493F6%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CFC921F5.493F6%stewe@stewe.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 06:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-wg/NKwcwzYmZMq8A4xK59fgZbvqLN8
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:33:46 -0000

On 6/20/2014 12:07 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
> That¹s a bad example.


On the other hand, it nicely demonstrates the challenge of our making
casual assertions (or decisions based on them) about this topic.  Not
that we didn't already know that...

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net