IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Working group last call for the draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa-00

David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EE7129D90 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:02:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.189
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYjT-v-of7U6 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F306129DCC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:01:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1486580503; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=noeapH+j3Vs842UnNMj2gOYmoRQ8XVvJdWHFfn7yL4s=; b=vMKnvTwhkedDXe8sJAzfjASYIflmAqfbxYurYC3v+FkxbsnEzNwmTzUHHep6NEas dG2M07Ah8Qn76D91Jt7Shi5XFZGfPDLKkKMq13Xm5IHw4F5RA0XUuL8/qD0jy12O 0TuYIERv0vaBXT+Ov1xd+LA7t2Mvand/BZms1GapZTwiIKm5ZtlJKzVslx54xgoH Fq1x7pQdKByz1LwoGKhuS8hvxyAUubyqvU3ByonPS8r4b6Bi/0239CZclyXIIpy4 0aCN6/1HE3Am6W5ffPdt38LzIxtWmgWDJQ12JMvtIddkXpdhhHxXOG+T1y+h9Gsm XWMjf0KW+glf9cgr0G4Now==;
Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.88]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 70.F5.21821.71B6B985; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:01:43 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-695109a00000553d-01-589b6b172cfb
Received: from nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01 (nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com [17.151.62.64]) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 47.16.05881.71B6B985; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:01:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from [17.153.90.196] (unknown [17.153.90.196]) by nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.0 64bit (built Dec 14 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OL200ICRKUT1D20@nwk-phonehomebzp-sz01.apple.com>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Sender: dschinazi@apple.com
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <22683.8182.349840.103676@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:01:43 -0800
Message-id: <D28C9CC6-FD00-4A42-8451-F9B0AA83E4BF@apple.com>
References: <22683.8182.349840.103676@fireball.acr.fi>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYoSuePTvCYNYlEYv9W16wWRw9/5zN gcljyZKfTB6Hvy5kCWCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mp4M/MTW8E3vorJ9yYzNzA28HQxcnJICJhI rNzWx9LFyMUhJLCXUeLsjAY2mMSm77OBEhxAiWOMEm98QcK8AoISPybfAwszC8hLHDwvCxJm FtCS+P6oFWrMLCaJtsuTmUESwgLSEl0X7rJC2P4Sl5ftZATpZQNqOLDGCCTMKWAusWjRfLAS FgFViTP7LjNCzBSSWLhgKyPEWhuJR48fgY0UEjCT2H9sIguILSKgKLH7yVYmiItlJT49/8kO YW9gk1i5W3QCo/AsJFfPQrh6FpKrFzAyr2IUyk3MzNHNzDPVSywoyEnVS87P3cQICunpdsI7 GE+vsjrEKMDBqMTDe8F6doQQa2JZcWXuIUZpDhYlcV5+k5kRQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanF hxiZODilGhi9m0U15slHuWo83dOyqUyrRiYh1HvC6ltcJrPvzniiPFGEYXvNju2lV0NCOZNS azIyUh6+Nzc9ZuR8V8s7vZt71juhCQvcGzzsfqyrXn9KqPID1yw1pyiVEjM+q/L7zi3CIZ53 b22pXZKyhb+G+T8/1wQ9fv5gg3DPTdkzZoQdTHeZ7uKkoMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAFVT3FBKAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiON3OQVc8e3aEwY2rAhb7t7xgszh6/jmb A5PHkiU/mTwOf13IEsAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXxZuYntoJvfBWT701mbmBs4Oli5OSQEDCR 2PR9NguELSZx4d56ti5GDg4hgWOMEm98QcK8AoISPybfYwEJMwvISxw8LwsSZhbQkvj+qBUo zAVUPYtJou3yZGaQhLCAtETXhbusELa/xOVlOxlBetmAGg6sMQIJcwqYSyxaNB+shEVAVeLM vsuMEDOFJBYu2MoIsdZG4tHjR2AjhQTMJPYfmwh2pYiAosTuJ1uZIC6Wlfj0/Cf7BEbBWUgu nYVw6Swkly5gZF7FKFCUmpNYaaqXWFCQk6qXnJ+7iREUnA2FETsY/y+zOsQowMGoxMN7wXp2 hBBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiUR3jlJQCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOMyUD3T2SWEk3OB0ZOXkm8oYmJ gYmxsZmxsbmJOWnCSuK8nvtnRAgJpCeWpGanphakFsFsYeLglGpgNFgw6U1J29RDcT27DW/t vPuY037h9bnzpB3ntmXdV680PFL+YoeiRNNuve7IA2XJrwwCfkesS2l+1ZnGKFj4YEE0R3He g+RVDrP3rvh9YrG0U9c59jj9RwauLnkH573xkjn9t5ln8a4bws/YfA8cqAnq2fVFMChs0lPJ VfnW+d9n/f7rwf25RImlOCPRUIu5qDgRAHMUMHKSAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/eaXT15HCFoohZnztQIA9pjziPg4>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Working group last call for the draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa-00
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:02:26 -0000

Tero,

I've reviewed this draft. I support it and believe it is ready to move forward
towards becoming a standards-track RFC. Also, would it make sense to ask
IANA for early assignment of the code point? Using 0 sounds reasonable to me.

Minor typo in the introduction:
    "we define a new value has in the SIGNATURE_HASH_ALGORITHMS notification,"
    s/value has in/value hash in/

Thanks,
David


> On Feb 8, 2017, at 05:41, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> This message will start two week working group last call for the
> draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa-00 [1] draft.
> 
> Please send your comments, questions etc to WG mailing list before
> 2017-02-24. If you belive that the document is ready to be submitted
> to the IESG for consideration as a standard track RFC please send a
> short message stating this also.
> 
> This document has been mostly ready for some time, but we have been
> waiting for curdle and cfrg to do some work needed for this. Firstly
> we needed to get oids from the curdle, and the
> draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-03 [2] allocating the oids is in the WGLC in
> curdle WG.
> 
> Secondly we have been waiting for the CFRG to decide wheter we should
> use contextes or not. This is same issue than in the TLS wg, so we go
> with the same resolution. CFRG has now decided [3] that no contexes is
> used in TLS case, and as IPsec is in similar situation, we go with
> that.
> 
> So as those things we have been waiting for, are now cleared this
> document can now go forward.
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-pkix/
> [3] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/current/msg08934.html
> -- 
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email