IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] TR: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02.txt

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45264129C6B for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 05:16:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMMpvuLbP9Mn for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 05:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orange.com (mta134.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA7E129619 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 05:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.68]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42rP2G4MCtz4x6Y for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:16:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.2]) by opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42rP2G3Xhxz1xp9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:16:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 14:16:54 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUd2QRm4UQYeYM3EWcvMle++2L1qVF2Z7A
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:16:53 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302E04234B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <154168245580.31150.9462703520955536832@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154168245580.31150.9462703520955536832@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.2]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/uvrE2qay3IKyNcwJv9pJns7JIaQ>
Subject: [IPsec] TR: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 13:16:58 -0000

Dear WG, 

First of all, I'd like to thank all those of you who commented during the ipsecme meeting on this draft. This is exactly the feedback I was looking for. 

The message I got from the WG after watching the recording is to reduce the number of requested codes which I did in -02. This is almost close to what is suggested by Valery and Tero. I hope that this issue is now closed. 

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2018 14:08
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc : ipsec@ietf.org
> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions WG of
> the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : IKEv2 Notification Status Types for IPv4/IPv6
> Coexistence
>         Author          : Mohamed Boucadair
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 6
> 	Date            : 2018-11-08
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document specifies new IKEv2 notification status types to better
>    manage IPv4 and IPv6 co-existence.
> 
>    This document updates RFC7296.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email