off-link model in the 6lowpan talk: draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD0B3A69F5 for <>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:15:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.013
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id scrNBV0pVeZn for <>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5478C3A69DF for <>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results:; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqYEAPFM+EqtJV2d/2dsb2JhbACCJC3DD5dPhD4EgWg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.44,712,1249257600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="67142828"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2009 01:16:12 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA1GCOx025367; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:16:12 GMT
Received: from ([]) by with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:16:12 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA61A3.63FBA100"
Subject: off-link model in the 6lowpan talk: draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:16:10 -0600
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: off-link model in the 6lowpan talk: draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07
Thread-Index: Acpho2L/Jl2V2o0PQ4mfc3f/coVifA==
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <>
To: <>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <>, <>, <>, <>, "Erik Nordmark" <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2009 01:16:12.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[641F3210:01CA61A3]
Cc: Dave Thaler <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:15:47 -0000

Humble apologies for not reading this lowpan doc, but I have listened to
its core ideas during the past IETFs prezos and understand the link
model being used for it.   I still have some general comments that are
worth discussing when bringing such work to 6man.


Note that if the multi-link, multi-hop network has all client nodes as
off-link to each other, then there is only one type of regular ND
(RFC4861) RA that can signal off-link.  This is an RA with no PIO
(Prefix Information Option).   So if the RA has no PIO, how are the
lowpann client nodes acquiring their IPv6 address global address without
SLAAC getting no prefix from?  In 6man, we would like to know how are
the lowpan clients acquiring their address and do they even have a
global v6 address?  I think I heard some mention of ULA, so that gives
me a hint of global address use because ULA has same scope as a Globally
Unique Address (GUA).   Therefore it would be interesting to see the
IPv6 ND RA config on the lowpan edge routers.


Anyone has working models of this work to demo to us during any future