<draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08.txt>
Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sat, 27 May 2017 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECAC129483 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1omDqeenuFW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2C2312947F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id z52so15385528wrc.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=Uc5vCLBhcZqQBcpriBn2E0xtkkXhcZoqbH2wvtBoZis=; b=i911G/3jXSjRlgMECCIxJP/r7Qt+F4OL13PZLkGCWdHuZ2WWQFWc8KiiogCqIxbT/i kND3rFKY7tpnRT6jhOgEU5feWzb5dey4iRZMgLxLeyHD6xTiAMdjf5MZtvduLVRdfyej a+0FT8D68Y38Adoqd+l0h5rhvmh69y3VIgGgFy8xs270/e6e1bY29bMOgOboKqx1nEjJ 3/eRFG0eEYINFrfoB5kenVKX07Qo0J6neKWBeCheLIT+jTiTE+RxDBGWOkS0CVUB28os gwr9dbYLaN7XDoIVqnhKVkER5NKVDSGM84aRch6PKcTi0cP+LjM3mti72xOcrf6Vr2I5 4EKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=Uc5vCLBhcZqQBcpriBn2E0xtkkXhcZoqbH2wvtBoZis=; b=gyrJsaporJzVT53t0Fu5+TF24nLdcLcol898McUJHnodo+n3pq/JqEpQrCQidi76Y3 Of+t/E23hQzGKbZoCfSwybkVhh9HoqPW/aZ8hEHXIoVfntJ5qKeGAEdBRbqBXuVB1Ek7 CLyt9+nLyu+YTIsE1pY647TOp1grl7hv2JDT+YsT3X3E2AJqL2XWYzbJOmSsqHUVqEhZ VCSn/hCi35yhvgGvW7Mk1gC1JqrkrP6bmTZt0af06poOovMU9V5trwbHN1NlFcceepMD 0rOlifqBR/SqX3XQcOeKu39h7r0HmWn1lWhrJ9x2JjUh/jJUsNBgXCm6sVfLmS1yadIn +fJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcByxT6ias8SvStFjlVPZnbUUdoRklp+ktn+HMxVHWcqS2XTTfv3 6WCg5tJpn/vDI0GZBZA=
X-Received: by 10.223.136.229 with SMTP id g34mr5776504wrg.42.1495900109280; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:591e:8ddf:9ba8:7dc3? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:591e:8ddf:9ba8:7dc3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b81sm6968997wmf.7.2017.05.27.08.48.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_54DE721B-D54A-4CC3-AE77-B8D809B7C0DA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08.txt>
Message-Id: <F657F655-9975-4C6B-BBE3-14D132EA817B@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 08:48:23 -0700
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/DpteLfT4QqJFTYwSZmPEE0WrpkA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 15:48:33 -0000
Hi,
I published a new version of rfc1981bis (-08). Links to the document below.
The changes from the IESG Discuss comments from IESG reviews. These include:
Based on IESG comments, cleaned up text in Section 5.3
regarding suggested action when PMTU value has not been
decreased recently.
Revision of Note in Section 5.4 to make text clearer.
Updated Section 7 "Acknowledgements".
Editorial Changes.
A diff from the previous version can be found at:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08.txt
Please review.
This is part of the project to move the core IPv6 specifications to Internet Standard.
Thanks,
Bob
> Name: draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis
> Revision: 08
> Title: Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
> Document date: 2017-05-27
> Group: 6man
> Pages: 21
> URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis/
> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08
> Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08
> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08
>
> Abstract:
> This document describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6. It is
> largely derived from RFC 1191, which describes Path MTU Discovery for
> IP version 4. It obsoletes RFC1981.
- <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-08.txt> Bob Hinden