IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue 20: Node Requirements - DHC vs. RA text

Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net> Mon, 26 July 2010 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@lava.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821E83A6A09 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pezSH8xrzSRv for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing01.lava.net (outgoing01.lava.net [IPv6:2001:1888:0:1:230:48ff:fe5b:3b50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456B3A6AD7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 05:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:1888::a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1888:0:a:214:51ff:fe29:1e4e]) by outgoing01.lava.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 000BF14E60C; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:23:16 -1000 (HST)
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:23:15 -1000
From: Antonio Querubin <tony@lava.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Subject: Re: Issue 20: Node Requirements - DHC vs. RA text
In-Reply-To: <4C4BE8F5.60101@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1007260220290.193@cust11794.lava.net>
References: <201007221805.o6MI54xB009199@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <4C48B7B4.3070800@gmail.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F14EC2789@crexc50p> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1007241734200.150@cust11794.lava.net> <4C4BE8F5.60101@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:23:02 -0000

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Brian Haberman wrote:

> Just for clarity... Do you mean RFC 5006 or its standards-track
> successor draft-ietf-6man-dns-options-bis?

The discussion started with bis but it looks like that got dropped 
somewhere along the way.  I think it would be problematic to require a 
feature that is considered experimental rather than standards track.

Antonio Querubin
808-545-5282 x3003
e-mail/xmpp:  tony@lava.net

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status