IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-01.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 16 July 2017 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901A3129AD1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_nN3an0h9iw for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E8F1200C1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u5so7657629pgq.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5TA6JQjBt/vBkSSwXimfpqu/Wx0LXmdIWY0/Pzd8HIc=; b=urbIY8NVydRczEjQO5TfaGbuNe6KX8FBqFbJTp6WyQcCW6gD8lalP6tUmlYjMnB5GC qRh/Z0+/fNq5V16E2Y1rfOrAUpMbkP1QUdW2LWL3TaAI4yV/9nmMKObZ7R2JPfeoldWn 4icIkOO9/6bcb+N1dOCcUR4g6ku1MhXbl/B99uR7EEoNJU3LimMnZ2yX98ANM3lTiWyF PBaBCKgtI6D4BmCWs14Z06ELBKINHOALJUtvJvl/3ud3hIChGwapLtF/f7lyP7lCpbWd GPW4KxFl1uSlILE/bwQEqGdRTMEz6KgCqvx5oW/vDszUvepNGriu8JCncILSVAP4tWp7 8dVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5TA6JQjBt/vBkSSwXimfpqu/Wx0LXmdIWY0/Pzd8HIc=; b=Wx3c/0xE1LmlT6sqO56UDZcMmscr5vvwydM7VEVPNsOgSVV99b7COg0yKCKyjRKzzg +zopnzdAfqu40i7AYszVPSoTUxHQ3Fo1npAWct6IywgyFNy51l9tE+fqZnE5giawzO/2 y1iKYq1rtxfJUtq4ThLqKtKl2xZyjuaQEg0cZL7GvBKOA9CEniTXaxmB4NxdkK12npHB 6GyyAo43pBtZu++RkYf4Dhyc8EjOWMtBPJzn4W3JNHXwckQzGsaRo11AOkyaBpYElLf1 Gmh4w1KodkUhKwFKAg7DRN6Bos3pE/03LB+qccDugCaLONwDI3Uh0XbgZf4/gGQbXZVn wbuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113UqhqYHeCWzbv1BzkIUn/6CaGNF1HASsYAFwTV4/e4smwKSqJt cVTRcIxEXTrlJWqK
X-Received: by 10.101.87.140 with SMTP id b12mr26396984pgr.174.1500246241784; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (69.21.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.21.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k127sm28877808pfc.75.2017.07.16.16.04.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jul 2017 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-01.txt
To: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <149909644776.22718.16227939850699261560@ietfa.amsl.com> <fef7bb88-1ebd-bba6-219a-dbc810f0a1b8@gmail.com> <CAOSSMjXDqWm_EvZqmCACoTESZpj-vMywkL8GqByYnC=DFKAa8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5a4d61e7-9ca4-b741-ddf3-2e3d3714d55c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:03:57 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOSSMjXDqWm_EvZqmCACoTESZpj-vMywkL8GqByYnC=DFKAa8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/KEYV5yvScoV4iA1Y-jgZc7gXxtg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:04:04 -0000

Tim,

Trimming this just to your direct questions:

On 16/07/2017 20:25, Timothy Winters wrote:
...
>>>    -  IPv6 over ATM Networks [RFC2492]
>>
>> Is this still worth mentioning?
>>
> 
> Probably not, we'll remove this in the next draft.  How do you feel about
> Frame Relay?

I don't really know - is it still deployed in the real world? If so,
you could leave it in.

...
>>> 6.6.  Default Address Selection for IPv6 - RFC 6724
>>>
>>>    IPv6 nodes will invariably have multiple addresses configured
>>>    simultaneously, and thus will need to choose which addresses to use
>>>    for which communications.  The rules specified in the Default Address
>>>    Selection for IPv6 [RFC6724] document MUST be implemented.
>>
>> I am concerned about the famous rule 5.5 in RFC6724. It's optional there,
>> but elsewhere you have a SHOULD for RFC8028, whose section 3.3 in turn
>> promotes rule 5.5 to a SHOULD. Could we add that promotion here
>> too? Otherwise there is a complicated trail for implementers to follow.
>>
> I like this idea, how about.
> 
> Since RFC 8028 updates rule 5.5 from RFC 6724 implementations SHOULD
> implement this rule.

Looks good.

Thanks,
    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email