Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2011 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CCF28C0D8 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXlyvwji02jn for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1343A6943 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi20 with SMTP id 20so1667958pxi.27 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to:x-mailer; bh=ZX/d2Q1putnJgri1VnSzs1zjt5CZNBjjzWQ1i1R7dvE=; b=NB8hY80P8yIb3nnGIyfPVoVWod65lAzofl09PMtoOkkEj6KuJ+hm+t+3G5trZe1TBq U5tPJPXtIPnazgHFj9FJWDNZQQzy8kLnTEAmOyuK0VfzNVgOFJbei3ENVCchz18EYFkI ALui5li4cswBMO2bhasUctEaSOw74airIX/gc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=quKICw2FknIzfjS0oUlij5RX110C5pThjIgn/xOVGwXtRJomRYC3bH/N9pRDX/hWfc a+0UQoXoAAp3At5qdCxGJNhXo4qYbnyiPJTi5mKzkKEMh16jqvGFuy5ax0/Qwp1Ds2D0 e3qTrkQ0vgq/gwMwJjGEtfCdDEV5uVBIU0y4U=
Received: by 10.142.150.16 with SMTP id x16mr1117122wfd.173.1302213169879; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.224.217] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm2718204wfd.13.2011.04.07.14.52.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:52:43 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0433A074-A784-483A-86D0-083878A5377E@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:51:09 -0000

Richard,

It is good to discuss this in 6man on the IPv6 list, but if you are going to resubmit the draft it should be named something like:

  draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming-00

as it is an individual draft, not a 6man working group document.

Thanks,
Bob



On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Fred Baker asked me to move draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04 [1]
> to 6man. Thus, we are reintroducing it as
> draft-6man-addresspartnaming-00 without changing anything in the
> actual text.
> 
> The DENOG reference has been removed for internal and political
> reasons but this ID still stems from within part of the community
> calling itself DENOG and enjoys broad support.
> 
> draft-6man-addresspartnaming-00 has been uploaded, but it's not
> released yet as the secretary still needs to make manual changes to
> document the transition properly.
> 
> 
> Anyway, after a long time of gathering feedback, we have boiled down
> the options to hextet and quibble. quibble remains in there mostly for
> historic reasons and to gather additional feedback. I do not think
> suggesting two separate terms is useful in the least and we hope to
> get input on this. The main problem with it is that quibble is
> overloaded in English and in a negative way. My money is on consensus
> evolving to drop it in -01.
> 
> The second question on my mind is if using MUST for hextet is
> appropriate. Using SHOULD is fine as well though I personally think
> MUST is better to avoid any and all potential confusion.
> 
> 
> We are really looking forward to any and all feedback,
> this issue might not seem to be important at first, but many/most
> people tend to reconsider after some thinking,
> thanks,
> 
> Richard Hartmann
> 
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming-04
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------