question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02 section 2.3
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 28 March 2011 08:23 UTC
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0F33A68F3 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.269
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.269 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2SUrupeoGE+h for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D9D3A683C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7BC4A9C; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:25:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5F39A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:25:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:25:08 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-02 section 2.3
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103281015240.4842@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:23:34 -0000
Hello. I read through 2.3 of the draft, and I am a bit unclear as to how the next-hop should be selected. In the case of my SLAAC machine, I see the next-hop for my default-route as a LL address. How would the SA and the default router LL be tied together? In the case of getting address using DHCPv6, there is also no direct connection between the default route and the SA, as the DHCPv6 server might be different from the default-route gw? There is a use of "destination D" in several places, for a default-route this seems misplaced and has caused misunderstandings recent discussions in v6ops, perhaps there would be benefit in using different terminology here? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
- question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Brian Haberman
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Mikael Abrahamsson
- RE: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Arifumi Matsumoto
- Re: question regarding draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-re… Philip Homburg