IETF Logo Mail Archive

Liaison from BBF

David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26CA28C12B for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:10:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HEMQitk+b2qE for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:10:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644FF28C0CF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:10:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nA95B7CC002298 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:11:07 -0600
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.50]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:10:36 -0600
Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:10:36 -0600
Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.4]) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:10:35 -0500
From: David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:10:33 -0500
Subject: Liaison from BBF
Thread-Topic: Liaison from BBF
Thread-Index: Acpg+vas8Ljm9WtrS7amLAiEU3PWIQ==
Message-ID: <60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4DEDE9BC10@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_60C093A41B5E45409A19D42CF7786DFD4DEDE9BC10EUSAACMS0703e_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2009 05:10:36.0427 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8B655B0:01CA60FA]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:35:49 -0800
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:10:44 -0000

HI:

Attached are a series of charts that outlines a problem the Broadband Forum is wrestling with in the IPv6 space, the charts are in effect a companion to a liaison sent to INTAREA. I understand agendas are full so there will not be time to discuss this in meeting time during the course of this week, so it is posted such that there is a chance for reflection on the problem (for those so inclined) on the list...and have opportunity for face to face with any interested parties...

Please direct any questions for clairification to me...and I can arrange to be found on breaks

Cheers
Dave Allan
Co-chair BBF Arch & Transport Committee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email