IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: EXPERIMENTAL Variable SLAAC draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac

Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com> Thu, 17 December 2020 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322663A082F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:54:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYdSt3FxjEcs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [130.37.15.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BA33A0822 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #157) id m1kptjP-0000ETC; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:54:11 +0100
Message-Id: <m1kptjP-0000ETC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: EXPERIMENTAL Variable SLAAC draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac
From: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <m1kprB3-0000MbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <52d30fd9-6f77-49fc-780e-6fe7cfdcee8a@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:33:38 +0100 ." <52d30fd9-6f77-49fc-780e-6fe7cfdcee8a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 14:54:10 +0100
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/u4zrhExjy2eO2ychkIdwIHkMYlQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:54:19 -0000

>It is an experiment of using a /64 from the mobile operator down into
>/65 SLAAC into car subnetworks.

Sorry, I confused the drafts.

In my opinion this draft should not be published. We don't need to 
experiment with with protocols that violate the IPv6 addressing architecture.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status