Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Thu, 14 April 2011 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D8CE07E6 for <ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkBd-psQMpkx for <ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E91BE0732 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30557 invoked by uid 399); 14 Apr 2011 20:58:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 65-241-43-5.globalsuite.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@65.241.43.5) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 14 Apr 2011 20:58:45 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 65.241.43.5
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <4DA76003.4050001@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:58:43 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110319 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Introducing draft-6man-addresspartnaming
References: <BANLkTik=FRQyL8HpH_OCVv+xnVbv9MO5Fg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kE0Q6xzOEYCqrifN=oOOj4vwFeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=kE0Q6xzOEYCqrifN=oOOj4vwFeg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:58:50 -0000

On 04/14/2011 13:23, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after renaming to draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming, I am still
> waiting for feedback.
>
>
> I am not sure how the exact procedures are: Does lack of feedback mean
> people are mostly OK with this or that no one cares?

To be painfully honest, most likely the latter, sorry. I've never had a 
problem with "field" as the description, and have never been confused 
because that's not a unique term. I agree with Karl that hextet is right 
out. I actually like the term quibble, because of (rather than in spite 
of) its alternate meaning, given how contentious various elements of v6 
design have been, and continue to be. (It also rhymes with nibble.)

OTOH, I did think of another candidate, felco (mash-up of "field between 
the colons"). Apparently this name is used by a brand of pruning shears, 
but I seriously doubt anyone would get them confused. My feelings won't 
be hurt if no one thinks this is an improvement, I'm ambivalent about it 
myself. :)


hth,

Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/