Re: [ipwave] Benjamin Kaduk's No Record on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-49: (with COMMENT)

Le 12/07/2019 à 07:05, Nabil Benamar a écrit :
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> 
> Definitely true. An attacker may use something outside the permitted 
> frequency range.

I am not correcting anybody.

But I agree with the original point that a highly sophisticated antenna, 
more directinal, more sensitive electonics, may allow attacker to listen 
and write to cars, from a relatively longer distance, without using 
illegal stronger power levels, but still staying with the permitted 
frequency range.

It is a matter of how much effort and wit an attacker can put into it.

Alex

> 
> 
> I will update the draft soon.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 19:31 Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker 
> <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-49: No Record
> 
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
>     Please refer to
>     https://www.ietf..org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>     <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb/>
> 
> 
> 
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     COMMENT:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     Remaining at No Record since I am balloting late, but:
> 
>     It may be worth noting in the privacy/security considerations that
>     an attacker
>     may not heed to legal limits for radio power and can use a very
>     sensitive
>     directional antenna; if the attacker wishes to attack a given
>     exchange they do
>     not necessarily need to be in close physical proximity.
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     its mailing list
>     its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list
> its@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> 