Re: [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma> Mon, 17 June 2019 09:48 UTC
Return-Path: <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650C312011C for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:48:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REywCjLIZYSq for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D13A120119 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id u13so19873032iop.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r/mzHri5/q63Uw4ecIynjWc8SvxpQu9zfLuD3asAvek=; b=fZij5y+4B3puiQt3QrtSKkCHBv1+eUaPF5AGXaeA4zQMhjmd8zaEvvF7w9GCEIQEvJ BQPvF8hYIlW41baMM0xcNcX/Q3mtYYvL9vTrxWre0Zg36WtlmKY2tWANF3XWSUJT5YRi iPMpVayKxBynOhApJpQ8enSXpvz/hRqgamtFiggVqCVmYYrlUMzz7wmKGNZ7FaIaUFEd rNj1uHyN+2GmvrhZKfyJT0c/BqOOM0DPnrtuV77syzKUvDbwdCGnmSjh1SqwbrKHdHaq 2qtkw62xiABjZT0oQ1jyFBftw+t43FSMd2d5n8kXEHcgi5ulKfLeqSt+D9pzGzJnoIKt og6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r/mzHri5/q63Uw4ecIynjWc8SvxpQu9zfLuD3asAvek=; b=TxNICj33JGfp8vVBwwB23zb6kAJvcJH2K2Bc3CfmB+ogyD2sZf/GHDQqGeCP9PbROc ozXQk5S+pO9Si1Ge8nXeNB7gK7E8DaSN5b62jGM9ajg8AKsT0+vBEM4xyv9ViJ2lGP9E xhALoUwzr4PHbvO7TaSzPtzjlvN/PYvFFyUeQo6z9Nr+DAqmAdFReO/X6YhjYEa6nTJV iaCxZhs7awfASCNiLFAbPLAht0S38S1m+NQ6VKwUsXrlO3AlUSKUysqTfzMOb28z8B77 kdtc3vqAU2ICfiX1/LBOOcfMX06GJWbPYYfLPPrh4eGG/3Gg6NQdL6NfxbZr2X7aeijv 9ijw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWFiVSU9lY7pNQ+3PPBBBP7o/ubKM6b4rQaGEHbMftgokP+lXK K0BHm8fS7U/NzA5LWHLRh89dzLbIZi7uhFWMY3dfXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxdaILctqwKgZI0fLe/PJbdzX8Bi5hE5E6rwe2WulGtwZrqQy9ZY7Jy6X6hImVr4NBJAkYWdaQ+f4GCG8eEmo=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8252:: with SMTP id n18mr1744ioo.230.1560764912225; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156067514313.12185.6559961431451739070@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156067514313.12185.6559961431451739070@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: NABIL BENAMAR <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:48:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8vqFcngv75CvQTSY1vnL1TsLWoFVtw8b_q6hvBRRdSMDZZsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, its@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002bf215058b81e688"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/FiekN3mfKg-GMXNLgxcKZ9DjSTo>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:48:37 -0000
Dear Roni, Thank you for your review. Please, see my answers below. On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 09:52 Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2019-06-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. Section 4.2 says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB media > as > QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of subtype > Data, > Null, QoS Data, and > QoS Null. > I will update the appendix to reflect the text in section 4.2. > > 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on > the > 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it > looks > to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left > for > the unknown future. > Should we reformulate here? > > 3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD TBD > TBD. " > . What are the TBDs? > The whole sentence will be removed. > > Nits/editorial comments: > 1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be implemented > on > OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2. In > Appendix > I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation in > order to > act as a host". I think that instead of "would" it should be "should" > also if > this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an appendix > with > "MAY" and "SHOULD > Agreed. > > >
- [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ip… Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [ipwave] Genart last call review of draft-iet… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… NABIL BENAMAR
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [ipwave] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alexandre Petrescu