IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ipwave] Review comments on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-04.txt

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Mon, 11 September 2017 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A0132ED2 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZJV5-f0b2cI for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0378A132644 for <its@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=794; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505148979; x=1506358579; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=5Bzz5MUJ+jW28Xpc7N1ghcJaexoNc8p1fH2DOm8ka+8=; b=Me0s5WmkxjKG+Eff4vq94i3488eQVaTRChdhL48bIzoAekv9y9DSTrZc XrzmfVrU+W+A0glRH9NJRJeNGBRsQBfACYHTSlJACPS7vT1CmRfm8MY0d uQLblLx4T5XCKXmbqllLRAaOcehtbstvQjW1GXoxG3pAk7KLIaEhsEFLP s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C9AACbv7ZZ/4wNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1uBUicHjhGQIYoujW8OggQKhT4ChCI/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkGeRACAQhGIRElAgQBDQWKGQMVriOHLg2DbwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2DK4ICgVCFC4JYgWOGMAWRc45FPAKPWYR2knGMU4grAhEZAYE4AR84gQ13FYdldogwgQ8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,378,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="283574950"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Sep 2017 16:56:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8BGuIdk019585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:56:18 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:56:17 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 11:56:17 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
CC: François Simon <fygsimon@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [ipwave] Review comments on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTH6nS3MdwWO6+I0K2nyn/HA8hRQ==
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:56:17 +0000
Message-ID: <D5DC0D5D.289FB3%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <D5C8D565.22C0C0%sgundave@cisco.com> <007401d32028$a06b8ce0$e142a6a0$@gmail.com> <534037a7-9be7-925e-cc3f-9f803a2f3c52@gmail.com> <D5DB288B.289F12%sgundave@cisco.com> <D5DB5C1B.22C936%sgundave@cisco.com> <9bb74762-2c28-cac9-7fd4-6406bcc601e0@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9bb74762-2c28-cac9-7fd4-6406bcc601e0@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.188.62]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <7E794CD0AB12D84982093DF5A805925E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/VcrwNSvNJVIZNcRLNjDY0iSw3CA>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] Review comments on draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-04.txt
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 16:56:20 -0000

Hi Alex,


On 9/11/17, 9:34 AM, "Alexandre Petrescu" <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [Sri] I agree. In the context of this document, what happens in the
>> application layer may be less relevant here. The spec needs to
>> explain how unicast, multicast communication work and based on
>> addresses in L2 and L3 headers ONLY.
>
>Is it sufficient that we just say we use IPv6 ND protocol for that?

Defining L2/L3 header mapping for 802.11-OCB access is very straight
forward IMO, but making ND work in that environment is not trivial (unless
I am completely off here). So, without telling how ND works, talking about
IPv6 packet transmission/reception may not mean any thing, as ND is the
essential control protocol for IPv6 operation.

Sri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email