[ipwave] IPv6-over-OCB - channel width 20MHz?
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 04 June 2019 11:05 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4301200D6 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 04:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkLc1tLdI5Qt for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 04:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3E5120018 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 04:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x54B5Fid029231 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:05:15 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D974E2056C1 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6C320557E for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x54B5FWd024558 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:05:15 +0200
To: "its@ietf.org" <its@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e7c381ff-0959-0f7a-2818-adaab2f39aae@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:05:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------53AA84352C37BB2679027D53"
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/vZEHqQnz81rVj7Vl16_s3377t4g>
Subject: [ipwave] IPv6-over-OCB - channel width 20MHz?
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 11:05:21 -0000
Hi IPWAVErs, I wonder whether someone has already tried 20MHz channel widths on OCB with IPv6? (instead of 10MHz classical). I am asking because our convoy trial requests now even more data between cars on IPv6; we seem to hit bandwidth limits. We are trying to accommodate this increased amount of data by grouping together two channels. This could be accomplished with the 'iw' command, I believe, because it is the one that sets the channel width to 10MHz typically. Some already tried 20MHz channel width on OCB with IPv6? Alex PS: to augment bandwidth we also try increases on MTU and related tweaks, but that is easy to perform.
- [ipwave] IPv6-over-OCB - channel width 20MHz? Alexandre Petrescu