[Jmap] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with DISCUSS)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 January 2020 18:41 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-websocket@ietf.org, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, jmap-chairs@ietf.org, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, jmap@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <157833606256.7987.10843100204677119647.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:41:02 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Cb9DHIoVzk6ChB-Rz1QC99ZRjp8>
Subject: [Jmap] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: (with DISCUSS)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-jmap-websocket-04: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jmap-websocket/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If I understand correctly, in JMAP transport confidentiality is required to use
for requests and in WebSocket it is required to implement but not required to
use. Which set of requirements applies to the binding specified in this
document?

[Jmap] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-jmap… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
Re: [Jmap] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Jmap] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Ken Murchison