IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging

Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmail.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <neilj@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FA3129AF2 for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 23:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.b=3byqTSnF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=PMA7PBPY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlCsPcXeo6UJ for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC1B129AF3 for <jmap@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from betaweb1.internal (betaweb1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.10]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6254D209CA for <jmap@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 02:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from betaweb1 ([::ffff:10.202.2.10]) by betaweb1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 09 May 2017 02:21:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=dwfOl3i+ZqkOX2dsRXAjk2t4CItAe 16j4UeGDgvZaDM=; b=3byqTSnFWYUmH9N6O9CC/WHQols0YwBlcUxgenYCL8s1r G/+PUEgOd5Eo6pBkIAhFb48wWsQlhwJmtj9Q5kjrs1n3+4/N8p8v3IiR2aJThXM9 BQexqTDpJbG/Ghhqd5TuApjKSUu3NIC03UuCPW3+qLrdHNumQyOPeLNyQ+dUmmIb oqnY0k1jVfpvYPI9f1SWEQEeCxd9s7bbSvXCdiGJMHFMTGTcgIluQokrUhQkZ2/6 SA40HuTrKkwJ2glOup9nUO9i5EpDZBoqlzK6W4vI6WqfPfEGyIciE3vOLRWYZAmT WIdilncmijYC5JxPvkH2k2EkfGojyEXq6F9QzFS8Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=dwfOl3 i+ZqkOX2dsRXAjk2t4CItAe16j4UeGDgvZaDM=; b=PMA7PBPYEC8m3pfGFWV5/2 2ABFfllMCUmDQh2mTC24n621cE+2EbCpJKcKvLGHplzItYEPyIjUuWqelU8N4Vqt GksM/ppLIqjUsRq0OLAquNIvw5ZaczMwsew8K8qpxc8Ho0FlMSNPGBQOSwop846e V5Nblpy8wNgMuWn/l0C7u7INFFjK0C6A6iQRNMOr95wYj1PBYZRFv2QrEbs9H8On novYDAf9l771JZMiEmW4drj7W6SWd65pDWl7nJ/cpE8az7LdifUKucLOKITw/a8Q k9njdRl9OJ76AloAgtOmQoBz3ZIs7BNb3ehTQQC8m8Y7ruovCzogG+nkj1Wxx3hQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2l8RWZjhAeam6xa9kWLh-UjBbI72AJtRxRuW4rK0mN3ee1-3uT9FsQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 21820E2689; Tue, 9 May 2017 02:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1494310874.2734294.970377357.2792F254@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@fastmail.com>
To: jmap@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_149431087427342940"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e7edfd09
In-Reply-To: <1494289751.131921.970152157.2A520058@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <20170507123912.GA22520@snake.grepular.com> <FF749B75-173D-4086-BAE6-AFB897D5F676@fugue.com> <1494224344.1447245.969038872.78D5E02D@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1494249269.88461.969397104.25D88F0A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <f43499ea-cc8d-4104-b820-d3144affb685@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <1494289751.131921.970152157.2A520058@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 16:21:14 +1000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/Ogs1Nz2HtopbvulhS3nKfNp6Pw0>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Hacker News Discussion - getMailboxes single data set vs tree primitives or paging
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 06:21:25 -0000

OK, there seems to be some agreement that this ability is desirable and
not going to cause significant downsides, so I'll put together a pull
request for the spec for people to review.
Neil.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email