IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABFD129A9B for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 05:49:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfKtjevVfqjy for <jmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 05:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BA4129A9A for <jmap@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 05:49:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1486561752; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=9fXnFMYNMMh9QOvWcO3mHGYfck7BvAFHtDqlBJoblMM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=KzRFy5CMUJ1ylE9WxPfIVtsTsum1bC/TWCB1wSubYFMuIB/rynKsdxzSbWe/AYchg9rRjG 7r3XVHZPFjEQc8GMPockaxrrRpvP5UfBmjmi2uDNlWpQw281QTgPKB2UqNRi174n4sSa8r 1jfOtCF7ydVlJRQmg3Fn6XLamHRGK54=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <WJsh1wA6w8YU@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:49:12 +0000
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>, jmap@ietf.org
References: <CAMQk0F-6CFLHKvTxSaPV20Lp-hVOSSk_WrHOGq6-LOUO8aDNww@mail.gmail.com> <m2poitydi9.wl-randy@psg.com> <e6403b4a-c2fd-4eed-ab17-610abd130e14@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <3b955910-12d0-2c56-0dc2-30279f98aea5@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:48:54 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
In-Reply-To: <e6403b4a-c2fd-4eed-ab17-610abd130e14@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jmap/kTyB9RMrm1OuXfPLsZeQ3DfeeQI>
Subject: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity
X-BeenThere: jmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: JSON Message Access Protocol <jmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jmap/>
List-Post: <mailto:jmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jmap>, <mailto:jmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:49:14 -0000

On 08/02/2017 12:56, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> Randy Bush writes:
>> yet another protocol that requires a flag day.  that has worked out
>> so well for ipv6.
>
> JMAP does not, AFAICT, require a flag day, any more than IMAP required 
> a flag day over POP. If Fastmail's deployment of JMAP-in-spe was 
> noticed by its customers, the noise certainly hasn't been loud enough 
> that I've heard about it.

Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email