IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [jose] PKCS #11 for JWK

Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com> Fri, 07 July 2017 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <nmccallu@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47AA131533 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MX7_dUePGOBe for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com (mail-it0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C195B12EC23 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m84so37414913ita.0 for <jose@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HSofTAq9nOGpvbP97hITeEI1/b+PdOHHrkYneRAqGWQ=; b=gICpToeHfdzgLfSJkFm/ohjDlC1m/EsddE8sTppwybqo3vuId3cKtxFTiHBPp60h9v Is9DpmmU/BNrR5HMDTaHXIw3sW9f2RFiNn0uEVTh2oS3rlLS/Wlc6uECnopCiX/uoszT 4D/9CRObKH1HFmWANxx+l5QZwqHFdv6zungVR39kav8MLz2F+FGT8RfYJmDbNwE5SREK 42uPTPd4r8Tb73yfaJq0PLFhL+aiNcdX0mueUPyYOcE5Ff9WjbCwnoy5uEZVOkUdiKr/ /2dqyaXcy7tdbgvK10OzRt39uIh+aMKlJeq2TLrTYjhd0uK1jCmpl8akxcS7asvqwPrH lA6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111u2siiWvdAp2oyZR97JJ7iCvctkW//jxdlSFIRahlpLvhSLtFu fqLOeEK8BAdU/+u2nblC9xhn4/fVn7t9zeg=
X-Received: by 10.36.254.199 with SMTP id w190mr3482449ith.108.1499437502933; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.132.88 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e5cb68fc-2ff4-e0da-c7ff-660c0bd9a35c@connect2id.com>
References: <CAOASepNR_1XjDaCHUyLL_o63EvBcQ6L1TyeMhdUzrbmtYSWRNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOASepOjSo_Lr4x3rzbPh0gxifh_csHY0d08hpRcSCeF0e+OwA@mail.gmail.com> <e5cb68fc-2ff4-e0da-c7ff-660c0bd9a35c@connect2id.com>
From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:25:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOASepPCG7DpU9=H6KUwrj4a-Ese9ap6v4CJiLDx9ZE5bkgKjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>
Cc: jose@ietf.org, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>, Daiki Ueno <dueno@redhat.com>, "Sorce, Simo" <simo@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/PA0TXj0xH2LLpv9p_k0Z5uMq7Do>
Subject: Re: [jose] PKCS #11 for JWK
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jose/>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:25:06 -0000

Yes. Thank you for correcting my oversight!

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov
<vladimir@connect2id.com> wrote:
> Regarding section 4 of the proposed -01 spec:
>
> When dealing with "oct" JWKs, shouldn't the PKCS#11 URI type parameter
> become "secret-key"?
>
> Vladimir
>
>
> On 05/07/17 21:01, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> I have updated the draft from the comments everyone has provided.
>> However, document uploads are currently locked due to the IETF
>> meeting, so I have attached the document here. Your feedback is
>> greatly appreciated.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
>> <npmccallum@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I have prepared an initial stab at a draft for offloading JWK private
>>> key data to PKCS #11.
>>>
>>> You can find the document here:
>>>    https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mccallum-jose-pkcs11-jwk-00.txt
>>>
>>> Thanks for your consideration!
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email