Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-01.txt
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Sun, 12 June 2016 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87E312D62D for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ocx3ocWmIgr9 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65A9612D662 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id v48so40568609qgd.2 for <json@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IIyRjN40iCuEeYTaBbbVXfI1ZSp4MLiAfUTeQyeYJ8g=; b=e1rTP6T3jiXDqBMFvK8ymwjfl7Ep7qmHcN9z8ACH7LXRhfMBaDZarLG63CXgesOi0z OKLLMOnkV2Sv1tWBae0DGFzcNAhVooVE3vmF6gTmFlKs6JQ+CI70YXqZ0x5Hd0/XGwQo kWzKvuKh3gQYBFTWlODdtHoHUyWqhNeKzjbwUg4jK01F28kyLBryKbpag61cR8aQIMVu 1s3XSkpFvFSytyNDOV4qtIzzcX0sxmIzA3r7QdFg0N8NXi3VQQP34oj2j39Bw5SXduAn ELZPZz5DjZwyPno0jgattDtaDMOACs2jMzhB9WVusga1UGlMjgIsyUE4opnlVoQozY12 ZIzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IIyRjN40iCuEeYTaBbbVXfI1ZSp4MLiAfUTeQyeYJ8g=; b=ZVKRJL7hgSdk0B357hFD9vrSDYgxxsmiWr7+Ji9bS31Xfky8uAZ05LIfj8YUYaJds0 UatWf2+Yvi+fatjMwRQMkdjioyDZSPVOpO9dCrTk/un2pIUX8WquEoJWT6werq1Sw3SM T7dmJ7hA2Fc+FYiw/KQLmZ5cMmY2KeurdhEibO/wPkA9/hR2oph4XYOyIKIYZDAGxCPD MazHWFvZo30zqarvEIT+aFSSMtw/MUT1RWHBfpb3dx2ghQwqBdJGZwYSyewcyGJnMfpm hUNtSqP7LtQucDP1Su1Ai2QHhiIqX5l31NG5jDg/Mml0VxiumhaQK6snYEGfl9WSioWz pLvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIGkP4C3g9AyPiYra6UAc0iiqso0DFamjKV7MJSRV3EsogBfVGiL3req23ZMOUD+ovw07/ZrpEEJ6zmlg==
X-Received: by 10.140.194.73 with SMTP id p70mr11426185qha.78.1465759734390; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.98.161 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.248.61]
In-Reply-To: <575DB410.1090309@tzi.org>
References: <20160612183925.5385.10856.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHBU6is-7PwigBKJMr9VrS1xK2EQzb+6Vge+vEpnhWym+zf-ww@mail.gmail.com> <575DB410.1090309@tzi.org>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6isRLYcYLonmmE_KzW7112ybjqe-vF27gTT_xWSSWJWaMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11427f304b7a0b053519c8a2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/7HcE70jJmvzC-TJKY2sIIC9hSbg>
Cc: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:29:00 -0000
Huh, I observe that 262 has been updated and now has a reference to 404. Which means that the assertion in 7159 that 262 also defines JSON is now incorrect. So I guess I should put back the two-specs language and remove the assertion about 262. On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > Tim Bray wrote: > > ECMA 262 > > I think that's a regression. > > ECMA 262 is *not* defining JSON. > > (If you are looking for more sources of definitions, can I offer the > documentation of, say, NSJSONSerialization?) > > Of course we'd like JSON implementations to implement JSON, but the > direction of the arrow of normative referencing is very clear here. > > Grüße, Carsten > -- - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see https://keybase.io/timbray)
- [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-… internet-drafts
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Json] I-D Action: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159… Tim Bray