Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 13 March 2017 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A69129540; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHxwCLL0wakQ; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E161128B37; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.107.79]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhTjQ-1cROm21uBk-00mZwW; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:23:22 +0100
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, Peter Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <otwresf20y4vnpmoboqqjnux.1489359742487@email.android.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <0d3258fa-0f9d-cc5d-06d7-fcba943349ad@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:23:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <otwresf20y4vnpmoboqqjnux.1489359742487@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ONAqVCTvpdU/oTq78wPt92ZoUiWczEgP+MlfZwRy2qEVtlFKnSA p1ebcexiZx5Nc33PxzOMmpeICWFJvTXl86sY0vvwt9PTFS+DUL+tJgSenbqqqo9ipcxUCL1 0e3g72J030txLwaop68Lkut4jNUgh07fOUumSc3YVIrWbNOmekZmYCCVPmIRBt8KO3hRSiG mQeKnrCNdT9s75Usbs0Eg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8bWtMcdviHI=:tsV1/zi7YPzEWA9zPU02wZ Qn1QQMA1Z/V6Mz3s/tbuyoK6NNu1n+W26wyFligSGhq4+k4X2nA0AgTHGTQwR5ZF1ZEtwYuw4 S8boytoF9IFmUPBxR0vai/hWrjQi8xLTHhz+j7tC1gu7u8T6rSIfKiXk3T5XWUhZYlkF3mSWM RUtU4hFfy//NIS+ACroOVat2vGwtC1m2rPDHYB4m8wYeo+dJDV/uydazEXi2jGIV8QNgYfjCn vxIYkAenSBlZw1SFClmBg08nHLVnFQUt1Yo55OrTieABa/otwjCfuqpiWoRPwfu1idEz86y+0 4L7qRu4DOqYoxH3dB3YktoqG07UfI3Kp6k0P+PcMxxK9qMfrpU3vkpF5evyV9o/8Giznjuh8m P4lkM2heiorEoL4Ozr8hHnD/prZKKjFWQAwMNNy/okguAkeylTBE9RTNY1qBXplLTJOIz1auZ zvaifaa9tyUmQUXnCZQvFGCqJYr8pxiYgklSNhci8MCbagQpK60P+/8c5e+eHBD/k++9eaCM1 rHOzvU6YS1g5aUNFJJSGXyRU+Cn0DzzoDMdQ4GUMn6MwqMGUI8GvT5/cAHxEyj/D/9SdRa2dL 2Pi2mqYAQjAg3ffv3w38YxeICfGsXtQAPkBtlQe/AmS1WHl5baN59jaYWI+n9gz/YeCi9x1g9 3L8fyByb7d/lXHI6fl30pdEJIgUqkzctd4V2GoUoyb2qSJr0t3HrVhkj8Pm88MuH522KRFATH DilpeNRGsu7km+PB+2m0rEfY9APvetxg6V8ZI9kAAZP7eMW8RmZ4dj1XLK5TTkpZMfd+N/2LE 4NRozLK
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/DXlvxnVy7nYOB6SeaYyc6llaXTk>
Cc: draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis.all@ietf.org, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, ietf@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Json] secdir review of draft-ietf-jsonbis-rfc7159bis-03
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 06:23:52 -0000

On 2017-03-13 00:07, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> (with half a Gen-art hat on...)
>
> Does the WG really want to revisit the anguished discussions that
> resulted in the changes to Section 8.1 of draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis
> between versions 07 and 08 back in late November 2013?
>
> See https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/current/msg02053.html and
> many, many messages beore this.
>
> Cheers,
> Elwyn

No, but on the other hand, we should acknowledge that apparently the 
text both about what's mandatory and how auto detection works is not as 
clear as it should.

Best regards, Julian