Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th

Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net> Mon, 07 March 2022 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@goessner.net>
X-Original-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0283A0FE9 for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fq46OBU96lkk for <jsonpath@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB543A0F61 for <jsonpath@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.38] ([88.130.50.18]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue108 [213.165.67.113]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MbizQ-1o198r0lWI-00dCTU; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 18:15:59 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------dXQOO3DJavZHiiPtaU1KP1MK"
Message-ID: <0246da51-b018-ab3d-1af0-b099d0f175a5@goessner.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 18:15:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, jsonpath@ietf.org
References: <CAHBU6iv2SASFOYA+FGnw=8EXuCXCbSYeR8rJDAO11X_w44Zi_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stefan Gössner <stefan@goessner.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iv2SASFOYA+FGnw=8EXuCXCbSYeR8rJDAO11X_w44Zi_g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AnRUpl4pTOfPLGjjqgvlQ1DK21h718B00Ytuy/P+NREtLypqTop spP6sLM8dNXl3TF0mp4CCpwWzt2guxXHJ3MB1NaKK8RStU3eJNxsmVcKE7g1nQWAy2lqrwX 6cEncSXf9ICCvehTMxhUv64vGqLX83pxCHIExfuuuKWNO0FbRXYjQELYtSQGxA910RhBC30 O95W32U6TFqwyJa6lq5HQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:86zNLXuwULs=:T2KixazZIzhiDIZwbkkb+5 Y1u5OKso95yZ4rWAB94DVemxtEywHh6VrMappxRC5mI3h/FHXKJ1nossFw5hnGJIWlUDmKRal pvDzhzDXORRAb4Kip6xkMWOqfppvT6tXVU2AOodNu92XS2Cr/k+O5B8jOp8lBsY+oQH9olkXq uc4zIojFl32T9iCP+41HTZye+9gAY9OZjOiFHlLBQSu/utOZySTyukdt9ghUhWRg/n3uvEnQ3 Dz1Niz74Pn0kiHanxdG09Flb822e86UsN/yGTi7e3sMlIw3cUkP9YUA0UBjxb0ZqCiTVgcRIH jKdL9104UUZf2q8tOuFEKw0R4IswGRIFBNpxIe1SKjiVVw7lFFA6BrMOnW1IZB6OMFYGRzTVr iKASfO/d1kPSgxL+PAsB0h/FjJD0LleRHKgn07BuM3UxvGve50jIW+cPIVmLpGj0vh3r5ldk9 itewdYk7mW7/WUQCnemoPfxChTcH+fDpnaKCPAkaOSnF+9oT9x682roRQpoPQvppSQJtPCbnv 6yHEJbb4mJKsaqbPUbbMXcH4+ZzphS7xOXDciydPsa8BhM4fsbNqfSqiYSUgJsth86qORgR1H wJtTmaQDDDHL0T+vRWeugHEnZvCVe5jFUPhfpCCd2H2YOULtNUlx6rENWLQXL/Dm4mthvS29e DqsZ9dVd/A5lKRlMN8X5Yw2RHbmMar5GCW2ZDn67uSRVoC77o/DVhpm9+k4oI++efYJ0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/mxU9daW9kVN7wHHgqhIhrxob8E4>
Subject: Re: [Jsonpath] JSONPath Interim, next Wednesday March 9th
X-BeenThere: jsonpath@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A summary description of the list to be included in the table on this page <jsonpath.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/jsonpath/>
List-Post: <mailto:jsonpath@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsonpath>, <mailto:jsonpath-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2022 17:16:05 -0000

I will be there, of course ...

I'm glad to see the draft approaching a stable version, thanks to Carsten's regex work, and would like to discuss following points ...

* Addressing object and array indexes (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/156)

* Making '@' optional (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/162)

* Let's discuss functions ... how could an extension point here look like ?

* Is there a policy for RFCs mentioning related standards? (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/issues/161)

* Making output of normalized pathes mandatory in the spec ... line up ABNF with the rest ?

* Is there value in defining the term "singular path" in the spec ?

* Let's finally agree on (not) supporting equality comparisons of structured values. (https://github.com/ietf-wg-jsonpath/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/pull/145)