Re: [Justfont] Early AD review of the document

Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> Sat, 13 August 2016 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@w3.org>
X-Original-To: justfont@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: justfont@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FFD12D531 for <justfont@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 04:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgRC0wZnJ7PX for <justfont@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 04:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from raoul.w3.org (raoul.w3.org [IPv6:2001:470:8b2d:804:52:12:128:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FA312D10C for <justfont@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 04:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp-94-65-82-247.home.otenet.gr ([94.65.82.247] helo=[192.168.10.44]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <chris@w3.org>) id 1bYXOz-0002Df-7M; Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:46:57 +0000
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, justfont@ietf.org
References: <DE76481C-2601-4186-A3D3-0D063A8D9F01@fastmail.fm>
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Organization: W3C
Message-ID: <0a5ea624-5006-e8dc-b9c0-944f1717c3c9@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:46:51 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DE76481C-2601-4186-A3D3-0D063A8D9F01@fastmail.fm>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/justfont/KastJfgdm7DDWYH2bfSTAY72hOc>
Subject: Re: [Justfont] Early AD review of the document
X-BeenThere: justfont@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Font Top Level Media Type \(just font\) WG" <justfont.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/justfont>, <mailto:justfont-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/justfont/>
List-Post: <mailto:justfont@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:justfont-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/justfont>, <mailto:justfont-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:47:01 -0000

Hi Alexey


On 2016-08-12 23:41, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi,
> A few minor comments on the latest draft:
>
> TrueType, CFF, SVG need informative references on first mention.
Agreed, will add.

These can be the same as the normative references later on? (for 
TrueType and CFF)?
Or should a new Informative references section with the same references 
be added?
>
> Should existing registrations under application/ be mentioned as deprecated aliases?
Yes, I believe they should.
> rfc6838 needs to be referenced normatively the first type media types are mentioned (in the Introduction section).
Agreed, will add.

-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain