[Keytrans] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for adoption: Key Transparency Protocol draft

[Shivan Kaul Sahib <[e-mail]>]

Hi all, the chairs think there is sufficient support for adopting this
draft. Closing out this adoption call.

Authors, you should be able to transfer the draft repo and publish a new
version of the draft, but let us know if you run into any issues.

On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 at 19:54, Prachi Jain <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thank you to everyone who has responded to the call so far.
> The adoption call remains open until December 9, 2024, and we encourage
> more of you to share your feedback. Please let us know if you support or
> oppose the draft, along with your reasoning.
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:08 AM Thibault Meunier <ot-ietf=
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I support adoption. I think the draft is moving in the right direction.
>>
>> Cloudflare is also looking to implement the draft, and keep that
>> implementation up-to-date with changes the WG would make. This is most
>> likely in Rust, and open-sourced.
>>
>> Thibault
>> On Friday, November 22nd, 2024 at 8:06 PM, Watson Ladd <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> I support adoption. I can't claim to have followed the conversations at
>> Vancouver that well, but it seems like most proposals are all very similar.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:43 PM Esha Ghosh (SHE/HER) <Esha.Ghosh=
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> I support adoption too; I believe the draft doc is moving in the right
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Esha
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Kevin Lewi <[e-mail]>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2024 1:38 PM
>>> *To:* Cory Francis Myers <cfm=[e-mail]>
>>> *Cc:* [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
>>> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Keytrans] Re: Call for adoption: Key
>>> Transparency Protocol draft
>>> You don't often get email from [e-mail]. Learn why this
>>> is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>>> I support adoption. I do believe the draft doc is moving in the right
>>> direction and is implementable. The main caveats I have are around the
>>> security guarantees. It would be great to see a formal analysis (w/ proofs)
>>> of the construction (not something that the draft authors need to do, but
>>> someone in the community) to help us better understand what the data
>>> structure can provide in terms of consistency / soundness.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:51 PM Cory Francis Myers <cfm=
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I support adoption. I've not contributed substantively to the current
>>> draft, but I'll be collaborating with Felix on a formally-verified
>>> reference implementation.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- cfm.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Keytrans mailing list -- [e-mail]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Keytrans mailing list -- [e-mail]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
>>
>>
>> --
>> Keytrans mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
> --
> Keytrans mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>